2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.11.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, crystal structure analysis, spectral investigations, DFT computations, Biological activities and molecular docking of methyl(2E)-2-{[N-(2-formylphenyl)(4-methylbenzene) sulfonamido]methyl}-3-(4-fluorophenyl)prop-2-enoate, a potential bioactive agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 13 C NMR spectra of 4CLPBIC that show the signal (experimental) at 139.81 ppm ( δ C‐Cl ) is allotted to C15 atom, which is bonded with a chlorine atom is computed (DFT) as 139.92 ppm and it correlates with Murugavel et al [72]. Similarly, 13 C NMR spectra of 4BRPBIC and 3BRPBIC show the signals (experimental) at 138.41 and 138.48 ppm ( δ CBr ) are allotted to C15 and C14 atoms, which are bonded with a bromine atom is computed (DFT) as 138.26 and 136.22 ppm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 13 C NMR spectra of 4CLPBIC that show the signal (experimental) at 139.81 ppm ( δ C‐Cl ) is allotted to C15 atom, which is bonded with a chlorine atom is computed (DFT) as 139.92 ppm and it correlates with Murugavel et al [72]. Similarly, 13 C NMR spectra of 4BRPBIC and 3BRPBIC show the signals (experimental) at 138.41 and 138.48 ppm ( δ CBr ) are allotted to C15 and C14 atoms, which are bonded with a bromine atom is computed (DFT) as 138.26 and 136.22 ppm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Similarly, for 4BRPBIC, it ranges at 175.90–27.85 ppm and 174.66–28.56 ppm, and for 3BRPBIC, the range lies at 175.99–28.85 ppm and 171.83–27.95 ppm. In 13 C‐NMR spectra of 4CLPBIC, 4BRPBIC, and 3BRPBIC, the signals at 176.22 ppm, 175.90 ppm, and 175.99 ppm occur because the C18 atom interacts with sulfur atom S1 ( δ CS) that correlates with Murugavel et al [72]. For the same, the DFT chemical shift is identified at 175.05, 174.66, and 171.83 ppm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The stability as well as reactivity of a chemical system was correlated to chemical potential and global hardness values [59] . The stability had a direct relation with global hardness, whereas it had an inverse relationship to its reactivity [60] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the global reactivity parameters are listed in Table 5 . Overall, the electron donating and accepting abilities were described by ionization potential and electron affinity [64] . The Global reactivity parameters (GRPs) explicated that all the complexes showed greater electron affinity (EA) than the ionization potential (IP) ( Table 5 ); hence, complexes have greater electron-accepting ability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Global reactivity parameters (GRPs) explicated that all the complexes showed greater electron affinity (EA) than the ionization potential (IP) ( Table 5 ); hence, complexes have greater electron-accepting ability. The stability as well as reactivity of a chemical system was correlated to chemical potential and global hardness values [64] . The stability had a direct relation with global hardness, whereas it had an inverse relationship to its reactivity [65] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%