2014
DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2014.964697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization, crystal structure, and DNA binding of two copper(II)–hydrazone complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 The C1-O1 and C8-O4 bond lengths of complex (1.289(3) and 1.283(3) Å, respectively) and C1-N1 and C8-N8 (1.331(3) and 1.314(3) Å, respectively) are similar and are in good agreement with analogous Cu(II) complexes observed in the literature where a hydrazone ligand coordinates to the Cu(II) center in its iminolate form. 2,13,14,25,33 The average of Cu-O bond lengths in the dinuclear complex (1.978 Å) is very similar to the corresponding distances in previously reported mononuclear copper(II) complex (1.978 Å). 22 However, the average of Cu-N bond lengths in the dinuclear complex (1.992 Å) is longer than the corresponding bonds in mononuclear copper(II) complex (1.918 Å).…”
Section: Description Of Crystal Structure Of the Complexsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…32 The C1-O1 and C8-O4 bond lengths of complex (1.289(3) and 1.283(3) Å, respectively) and C1-N1 and C8-N8 (1.331(3) and 1.314(3) Å, respectively) are similar and are in good agreement with analogous Cu(II) complexes observed in the literature where a hydrazone ligand coordinates to the Cu(II) center in its iminolate form. 2,13,14,25,33 The average of Cu-O bond lengths in the dinuclear complex (1.978 Å) is very similar to the corresponding distances in previously reported mononuclear copper(II) complex (1.978 Å). 22 However, the average of Cu-N bond lengths in the dinuclear complex (1.992 Å) is longer than the corresponding bonds in mononuclear copper(II) complex (1.918 Å).…”
Section: Description Of Crystal Structure Of the Complexsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A classical intercalation binding requires the space of adjacent base pairs to be large enough to accommodate the bound small molecules and to elongate the double helix, resulting in an increase of ct-DNA viscosity [34]. In contrast, there is little effect on the viscosity of DNA if electrostatic or groove binding occurs [35]. …”
Section: Viscosity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The interaction of transition metal complexes with DNA continues to attract interest in relation to enzyme-DNA interaction and in the search for anticancer chemotherapeutic agents [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Transition metal complexes can bind to DNA via covalent and/or non-covalent interactions [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of above importance and in continuation of our research in the field of biologically active complexes [30][31][32][33], we herein report the syntheses, spectroscopic characterization and DNA binding studies of Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%