2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9dt00143c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of cationic organoruthenium(ii) fluorene complexes: influence of the nature of the counteranion

Abstract: In this study, the in vitro antiproliferative activity and the in vivo toxicity of ruthenium arene complexes bearing fluorene bidentate ligands was assessed in human breast cancer cells and on the development of zebrafish embryos, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dark and light IC 50 values of the complexes against various cancer cell lines are listed in Table S5. The reduced cytotoxicity of cisplatin was probably due to the short‐term incubation (4 h) [42,45–47] . Upon 465 nm light irradiation, Ir1 – Ir3 exhibited much higher photo‐cytotoxicity index (PI, PI=IC 50 dark /IC 50 light ) than 5‐ALA (PI=23–793 for Ir1 – Ir3 vs. 22.37–29.63 for 5‐ALA) against various cancer cell lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dark and light IC 50 values of the complexes against various cancer cell lines are listed in Table S5. The reduced cytotoxicity of cisplatin was probably due to the short‐term incubation (4 h) [42,45–47] . Upon 465 nm light irradiation, Ir1 – Ir3 exhibited much higher photo‐cytotoxicity index (PI, PI=IC 50 dark /IC 50 light ) than 5‐ALA (PI=23–793 for Ir1 – Ir3 vs. 22.37–29.63 for 5‐ALA) against various cancer cell lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular ruthenium levels of each complex appeared to depend on their respective lipophilicity, in agreement with previous reports demonstrating that more hydrophobic systems have a greater affinity for the cell membrane. 47 For instance, lipophilic counterion-containing compounds 2 and 3 (BPh 4 -) displayed the highest ruthenium cellular uptake (3 > 2 > 1, 4, 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63,64 Also, the zebrafish embryo assay has previously been reported to be a suitable phenotype-based screening method to assess the in vivo toxicity of ruthenium complexes. 47,[65][66][67] Because of their greater in vitro cytotoxicity in T47D cells compared to that of the currently used chemotherapeutic agent cis-platin, complexes 2 and 3 were selected for an in vivo toxicity assessment using the zebrafish embryo assay. Hatching rates, survival rates and phenotype changes of the zebrafish embryos treated with 12.5 μM of each compound were determined at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post fertilization (hpf) ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anionic Ru(III) species 3, Na[trans-RuCl 4 ATZ(DMSO)], was also prepared by allowing Na[trans-RuCl 4 (DMSO) 2 ] to react with anastrozole in acetone overnight at room temperature (56% yield). Keeping in mind that the anticancer properties of metal complexes often vary with their lipophilicity [27,54], the sodium counterion in the structure of 3 was replaced with a more lipophilic cation. Complex 5, PPh 4 [trans-RuCl 4 ATZ(DMSO)], was then obtained (70% yield) by allowing a methanol solution of compound 3 to react with PPh 4 Cl for 4 h at room temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%