2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and solution properties of cationic gemini surfactants with long unsaturated tails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formally, geminis that are asymmetric (e.g., those with a lysine spacer) are classified as geminoid or gemini-like surfactans [ 36 , 37 ]. Hydrophobic fragments (tails) used in gemini surfactants vary in length (usually 8–20), structure (straight or branched chain) [ 38 ], and saturation [ 39 ]; tails can be fluorinated [ 40 ], contain poly(ethylene oxide) [ 41 ], cholesterol [ 42 ], or aromatic backbones [ 43 ]. Gemini surfactants are an intriguing group of compounds owing to their increased solubility in water, superior surface tension reduction power, reduced proximity between hydrophobic groups, lower critical micellar concentration (by one or more magnitudes), and superior wetting characteristics as compared to the corresponding single chain (monomeric) surfactants, which makes them convenient candidates for pharmaceuticals formulations [ 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formally, geminis that are asymmetric (e.g., those with a lysine spacer) are classified as geminoid or gemini-like surfactans [ 36 , 37 ]. Hydrophobic fragments (tails) used in gemini surfactants vary in length (usually 8–20), structure (straight or branched chain) [ 38 ], and saturation [ 39 ]; tails can be fluorinated [ 40 ], contain poly(ethylene oxide) [ 41 ], cholesterol [ 42 ], or aromatic backbones [ 43 ]. Gemini surfactants are an intriguing group of compounds owing to their increased solubility in water, superior surface tension reduction power, reduced proximity between hydrophobic groups, lower critical micellar concentration (by one or more magnitudes), and superior wetting characteristics as compared to the corresponding single chain (monomeric) surfactants, which makes them convenient candidates for pharmaceuticals formulations [ 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table , the α value of C25‐6‐C25 is 0.67 and that of counterion binding β is 0.33. Compared with the β value of 22:1‐6‐22:1, that of C25‐6‐C25 increases with an increasing tail length of surfactant. Zhu et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The results are shown in Table , which shows that the value of a min of C25‐6‐C25 is larger than that of 22:1‐6‐22:1 (0.75 nm 2 ) . A possible explanation for this is that longer hydrophobic chains are more prone to curling, thereby increasing the value of a min …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations