2016
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and evaluation of hydroxyazolopyrimidines as herbicides; the generation of amitrole in planta

Abstract: Inhibition of IspD leading to herbicidal activity has been ruled out as the mode of action for the hydroxytriazolopyrimidine class of herbicides. Additionally, tobacco plants overexpressing lycopene β-cyclase showed tolerance to amitrole, which indicates that this is the main herbicidal mode of action for amitrole. Results from the metabolic fate study of selected hydroxytriazolopyrimidines suggested that the herbicidal activity displayed by these compounds is due to amitrole production, which was confirmed wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The active site of At IspD comprises subpockets for the methylerythritol, phosphate, ribose, and cytosine moieties of the substrates 2 C -methyl- d -erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) and CTP (Scheme A). The allosteric pocket, which opens up upon binding the previously reported allosteric inhibitors 1 – 3 ,, and the new phenylisoxazol ligand 4 (Figure ) is in close proximity, 6–8 Å away from the methylerithritol subpocket. This binding pocket is not developed in the ligand-free state, and conformational changes induced by its formation mediate the allosteric inhibition (see below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active site of At IspD comprises subpockets for the methylerythritol, phosphate, ribose, and cytosine moieties of the substrates 2 C -methyl- d -erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) and CTP (Scheme A). The allosteric pocket, which opens up upon binding the previously reported allosteric inhibitors 1 – 3 ,, and the new phenylisoxazol ligand 4 (Figure ) is in close proximity, 6–8 Å away from the methylerithritol subpocket. This binding pocket is not developed in the ligand-free state, and conformational changes induced by its formation mediate the allosteric inhibition (see below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 6‐phenoxy‐[1,2,4]‐triazolo[1,5‐ a ]pyrimidine‐5,7‐diol 37 (63 %) was synthesized using Na as a base and EtOH as the solvent in the reaction of 1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐amine with diethyl 2‐phenoxymalonate at reflux during 18 h (Scheme 21). [31] …”
Section: Triazolopyrimidine Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 6-phenoxy-[1,2,4]-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-5,7diol 37 (63 %) was synthesized using Na as a base and EtOH as the solvent in the reaction of 1,2,4-triazol-5-amine with diethyl 2-phenoxymalonate at reflux during 18 h (Scheme 21). [31] The synthetic procedure of the steroidal D-ring substituted [1,2,4]-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidyl derivatives 38 (50-54 %) was performed by Fan et al [32] The Claisen condensation of Δ 1,4 -pregnadien-3,20-dione or 4-chloro-Δ 1,4 -pregnadien-3,20dione with dimethyl oxalate in dichloromethane led to the 21-methoxalyl derivative. Treating the latter with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole in the reflux of acetic acid and KOAc resulted in the triazolopyrimidine derivative (Scheme 22).…”
Section: Synthesis Of Triazolopyrimidines Derivatives From Aminotriazolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Knowledge of a herbicide's enzymatic target, the site of action (SoA), is of high importance to avoid repeated use of herbicides with the same target resulting in the selection of target site resistant weeds. For most herbicides, the enzymatic target is known or has recently been identified, like for aclonifen, 5 amitrole 6 and cinmethylin. 7 However, there are still several, especially older herbicides, for which the target enzyme has not been identified yet (HRAC class 0).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of cinmethylin (A) and methiozolin (B) on the metabolite levels in Lemna plants. Boxes indicate accumulation (red) or depletion (blue) for three different timepoints (6, 24) and 48 h after treatment and two herbicide rates (10 and 100 μ m for cinmethylin, 100 and 500 μ m for methiozolin). Shown are only data for metabolites with significant effects (Welch‐test, P < 0.05) compared to mock treated control plants grown, harvested and analyzed in parallel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%