1995
DOI: 10.1021/om00005a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Ph3Ln(THF)3 (Ln = Er, Tm)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tm-C distance of 2.502(5) Å is only the second Tm(III)-C(sp 3 ) distance to be measured crystallographically; the Tm-C distances in (g 2 -C 10 H 14 )TmI(DME) 2 , prepared from the reaction between TmI 2 and anthracene and the only other reported complex containing a Tm(III)-C(sp 3 ) bond, are 2.479(5) and 2.471(6) Å [DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane] [6]. The Tm-C distance in 6 compares with Tm-C(sp 2 ) distances of 2.421 (6) 2.416(7) Å in Ph 3 Tm(THF) 3 [7] and 2.413(3) Å in (2,6-Ar 2 C 6 H 3 )TmCl 2 (THF) 2 [Ar = 1-naphthyl] [8]. Surprisingly, the difference in the Y-C and Tm-C distances in 5 and 6 (0.045 Å ) is somewhat larger than the difference in ionic radii of Y(III) and Tm(III) [ionic radii for six-coordinate Y(III) 0.900, Tm(III) 0.880 Å [3]].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Tm-C distance of 2.502(5) Å is only the second Tm(III)-C(sp 3 ) distance to be measured crystallographically; the Tm-C distances in (g 2 -C 10 H 14 )TmI(DME) 2 , prepared from the reaction between TmI 2 and anthracene and the only other reported complex containing a Tm(III)-C(sp 3 ) bond, are 2.479(5) and 2.471(6) Å [DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane] [6]. The Tm-C distance in 6 compares with Tm-C(sp 2 ) distances of 2.421 (6) 2.416(7) Å in Ph 3 Tm(THF) 3 [7] and 2.413(3) Å in (2,6-Ar 2 C 6 H 3 )TmCl 2 (THF) 2 [Ar = 1-naphthyl] [8]. Surprisingly, the difference in the Y-C and Tm-C distances in 5 and 6 (0.045 Å ) is somewhat larger than the difference in ionic radii of Y(III) and Tm(III) [ionic radii for six-coordinate Y(III) 0.900, Tm(III) 0.880 Å [3]].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Solutions of Eu(C 6 F 5 ) 2 were prepared via a well-established metal-exchange route as outlined in eq 1. 25 After Bochkarev et al already reported in 1995 on the structural characterization of the first phenyl lanthanides with Er and Tm, 26 a third representative of this class of compounds, ScPh 3 (THF) 2 , followed in 1999. 27 Its synthesis involves salt metathesis of ScCl 3 -(THF) 3 with 3 equiv of PhLi.…”
Section: Homoleptic σ-Aryl Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…δ 214 for the free carbene ligand) and shows a 13 C-89 Y coupling of 33 Hz which indicates that the Y-C bond does not dissociate rapidly on the NMR time scale. 101 The bulkier 1,3-diisopropyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene ( i Pr-Carb) has been used to synthesize a mixed carbene-THF alkyl Lu(CH 2 -SiMe 3 ) 3 (THF)( i Pr-Carb) (26). 22d Due to its higher steric demand, the carbene ligand occupies an equatorial position (Lu-C(Carb) ) 249 pm).…”
Section: Scheme 11 Preparation Of [Arnc(me)chc(me)nar]scme 2 (Thf) Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ln ϭ Er, Tm)[21] (Figure 1). Likewise, the angles at the samarium atom are considerably bigger for CSm-C (101.1(2)Ϫ107.7(2)°), compared to the angles O-Sm-O (73.84(15)Ϫ80.55(14)°) but the differences in 1 are greater than in the trisaryl compounds (Er: 99.2Ϫ103.5°and 77.7Ϫ80.6°, Tm: 99.8Ϫ102.9°and 79.0Ϫ81.0°) or in hexaoxo-coordinated Ln(OSiPh 3 ) 3 (THF) 3 (Ln ϭ Y: 100.8Ϫ102.3°and 79.6Ϫ82.2°[22]; Ce: 100.4Ϫ103.3°and 76.5Ϫ83.1°[23]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%