2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of cross-linked molecularly imprinted polyacrylamide for the extraction/preconcentration of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid from water samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated in Table S1 in the ESM, the conversion ratio of the AM in MIP (62.90 %) was 5.71 % higher than that in the NIP (59.50 %), revealing that the reactivity of AM in synthesis of MIP was higher. These results suggested that selective cavities were successfully formed in MIP, which was in agreement with the greater selectivity of the MIP [35]. Figure 2 shows the trend of the imprinting factor with the variation of functional monomer-template (M-T) molar ratio in the range 120:1 to 2000:1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As indicated in Table S1 in the ESM, the conversion ratio of the AM in MIP (62.90 %) was 5.71 % higher than that in the NIP (59.50 %), revealing that the reactivity of AM in synthesis of MIP was higher. These results suggested that selective cavities were successfully formed in MIP, which was in agreement with the greater selectivity of the MIP [35]. Figure 2 shows the trend of the imprinting factor with the variation of functional monomer-template (M-T) molar ratio in the range 120:1 to 2000:1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This indicated that the selectivity is 8 and 2 times greater for ketoprofen in the presence of fenoprofen and gemfibrozil, respectively, compared to the NIP. These results indicated that the MIP was highly selective for ketoprofen recognition, relative to the NIP, in aqueous samples which resulted in a low selectivity coefficient (Mata et al, 2014). The order of sorption onto the MIP was ketoprofen > fenoprofen > gemfibrozil.…”
Section: Selectivity Of Mipmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where: Q is the amount of the adsorbed molecule at equilibrium (mg•g -1 ), n is the Freundlich exponent depicting the adsorption intensity, C e is the equilibrium concentration of the target molecule (mg•L -1 ), α is the adsorption capacity of the target molecule (mg•g -1 ), Q max is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg•g -1 ) and K L is the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (Madikizela and Chimuka, 2016b;Mata et al, 2014). Linear plots were obtained for both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms (Fig.…”
Section: Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Surface Adsorption Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em 1724 cm -1 é observada a banda vibracional referente ao grupo carboxila (C=O) do ácido carboxílico, que originariamente era uma banda de estiramento a 1670 cm -1 e esta variação de energia do grupo funcional indica o envolvimento do grupo carboxílico na formação do polímero (UMEMURA & HAYASHI, 1974;RAVICHANDRAN et. al., 2004 (SANTOS et al, 2009;MATA et al, 2014;MARESTONI et. al., 2014).…”
Section: Caracterização Eletroquímicaunclassified