Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1972
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(72)90467-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syntheses and biological activities of analogs of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is the possibility, therefore, that the antisera could cross-react and inhibit an FSH-RH if it had an amino acid sequence identical with that of the C02H-terminus of LH-RH but different to the NH2-terminus. This has been shown to be unlikely, as a wide variety of LH-RH fragments have been tested and shown to possess little or no FSH releasing activity (Fujino, Kobayashi, Obayashi, Fukuda, Shinagawa, Yamazaki & Nakayama, 1972;Monahan, Rivier, Vale, Guillemin & Burgus, 1972;Schally, Arimura, Carter, Redding, Geiger, König, Wissman, Jaeger, Sandow, Yanaihara, Yanaihara, Hashimoto & Sakagami, 1972;Okada, Kitamura, Baba, Arimura & Schally, 1973;Yanaihara, Tsuji, Yanaihara, Hashimoto, Kaneko, Oka, Arimura & Schally, 1973). Also, Jeffcoate, Sharp, Fraser, Holland & Gunn (1974) have shown, using ion-exchange chromatography on carboxymethylcellulose, that there is a single immunoreactive substance with the mobility of the decapeptide in rat hypo¬ thalamic extracts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is the possibility, therefore, that the antisera could cross-react and inhibit an FSH-RH if it had an amino acid sequence identical with that of the C02H-terminus of LH-RH but different to the NH2-terminus. This has been shown to be unlikely, as a wide variety of LH-RH fragments have been tested and shown to possess little or no FSH releasing activity (Fujino, Kobayashi, Obayashi, Fukuda, Shinagawa, Yamazaki & Nakayama, 1972;Monahan, Rivier, Vale, Guillemin & Burgus, 1972;Schally, Arimura, Carter, Redding, Geiger, König, Wissman, Jaeger, Sandow, Yanaihara, Yanaihara, Hashimoto & Sakagami, 1972;Okada, Kitamura, Baba, Arimura & Schally, 1973;Yanaihara, Tsuji, Yanaihara, Hashimoto, Kaneko, Oka, Arimura & Schally, 1973). Also, Jeffcoate, Sharp, Fraser, Holland & Gunn (1974) have shown, using ion-exchange chromatography on carboxymethylcellulose, that there is a single immunoreactive substance with the mobility of the decapeptide in rat hypo¬ thalamic extracts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The product was eluted with CHCL-EtOH' (19:1): yield, 20 mg. (GnRH),1'6 as well as of GnRH analogs.7 '13 In a collaborative project with Takeda Industries, Ltd., the effects of simple substitution of several of the amino acids in the GnRH molecule with other naturally occurring amino acids have been studied. 12 In a recent report the effect of modification of an amide function on proline in position 9 has been explored. From these efforts have emerged several noteworthy agonists in the [des-Gly10] series,13 one of which demonstrates up to five times the activity of GnRH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous peptide GnRH derivatives have been synthesized and studied for their so‐called structure–affinity relationships, with the aim to improve their affinity, potency and/or metabolic stability (Fujino et al ., ; Monahan et al ., ; Karten and Rivier, ; Sealfon et al ., ; Hovelmann et al ., ; Millar et al ., ) In summary, it was established that the NH 2 ‐terminal domain (pGlu–His–Trp–Ser) of GnRH is important for receptor binding and activation with Trp 3 as a critical residue. In addition, the COOH‐terminal domain (Pro–Gly–NH 2 ) is crucial for receptor binding where substitution of Pro 9 or removal of NH 2 results in very low affinity unless the COOH‐terminal tail is substituted for an ethylamide, which also improves metabolic stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%