2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00110-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production – an online study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
102
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
102
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous behavioral studies have shown syntactic priming effects during both sentence production (Smith & Wheeldon, 2001;Hartsuiker & Kolk, 1998;Hartsuiker, Kolk, & Huiskamp, 1999;Hartsuiker & Westenberg, 2000;Pickering & Branigan, 1998Bock, 1986;Bock & Griffin, 2000) and comprehension (Potter & Lombardi, 1998;Branigan, Pickering, Liversedge, Stewart, & Urbach, 1995;Frazier, Tapt, Roeper, & Clifton, 1984;Mehler & Carey, 1967). In controlled sentence production tasks (sentence completion, picture description, sentence recall), subjects tend to convey their messages in identical syntactic forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous behavioral studies have shown syntactic priming effects during both sentence production (Smith & Wheeldon, 2001;Hartsuiker & Kolk, 1998;Hartsuiker, Kolk, & Huiskamp, 1999;Hartsuiker & Westenberg, 2000;Pickering & Branigan, 1998Bock, 1986;Bock & Griffin, 2000) and comprehension (Potter & Lombardi, 1998;Branigan, Pickering, Liversedge, Stewart, & Urbach, 1995;Frazier, Tapt, Roeper, & Clifton, 1984;Mehler & Carey, 1967). In controlled sentence production tasks (sentence completion, picture description, sentence recall), subjects tend to convey their messages in identical syntactic forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During production, syntactic priming is reflected in an increased likelihood to choose, for instance, the same grammatical voice (active versus passive) or the same type of dative construction (double-object versus prepositional dative) in consecutive sentences (e.g. Bock, 1986;Bock & Loebell, 1990) or in faster speech onsets for repeated syntactic structures (Corley & Scheepers, 2002;Segaert, Menenti, Weber, & Hagoort, 2011;Smith & Wheeldon, 2001;Wheeldon & Smith, 2003;Wheeldon, Smith, & Apperly, 2011). Syntactic priming in comprehension is shown in anticipatory eye-movements to pictures (Arai, van Gompel, & Scheepers, 2007;Carminati, van Gompel, Scheepers, & Arai, 2008;Thothathiri & Snedeker, 2008a;Traxler, 2008), in faster reading (Traxler & Tooley, 2008) and in picture-matching choices for ambiguous phrases (Branigan, Pickering, & McLean, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researches above mainly take the response biases of the target sentences produced by the subjects as the study index, and few experiments consider the reaction time (RT for short) as the measurement (except Corley & Scheepers, 2002;Smith & Wheeldon, 2001;Wheeldon, Smith & Apperly, 2011;Wheeldon & Smith, 2003). Because the pause during the sentence production needs to be controlled.…”
Section: The Sentence Completion Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%