Object Recognition Supported by User Interaction for Service Robots
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2002.1047421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergism in low level vision

Abstract: Guiding image segmentation with edge information is an often employed strategy in low level computer vision. To improve the trade-off between the sensitivity of homogeneous region delineation and the oversegmentation of the image, we have incorporated a recently proposed edge magnitudekonjidence map into a color image segmenter based on the mean shift procedure. The new method can recover regions with weak but sharp boundaries and thus can provide a more accurate input for high level interpretation modules. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
210
0
5

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
210
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the Berkeley image dataset does not have calibrated images and, consequently, we can not assure a good transformation from sRGB to CIE Luv. Second, because the size of L, u and v, is not the same and the method will require six parameters, instead of two, that is, − → σ L , − → σ u Figure 5 shows some results for the mean shift segmentation, corresponding to (h s , h r ) = { (7,15), (13,19), (17,23), (20,25), (25,30), (30, 35)}. These results point out the main advantage of RAD in favor of MS, namely, the capability of RAD to capture the DS of a histogram, whereas MS is ignorant to the physical processes underlying the structure of the DSs as Abd-Almageed and S. Davis explain in [10].…”
Section: Results and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the Berkeley image dataset does not have calibrated images and, consequently, we can not assure a good transformation from sRGB to CIE Luv. Second, because the size of L, u and v, is not the same and the method will require six parameters, instead of two, that is, − → σ L , − → σ u Figure 5 shows some results for the mean shift segmentation, corresponding to (h s , h r ) = { (7,15), (13,19), (17,23), (20,25), (25,30), (30, 35)}. These results point out the main advantage of RAD in favor of MS, namely, the capability of RAD to capture the DS of a histogram, whereas MS is ignorant to the physical processes underlying the structure of the DSs as Abd-Almageed and S. Davis explain in [10].…”
Section: Results and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, RAD is compared with Mean Shift (MS) [8], [22]. MS has been chosen because it is widely used, has a public available version, the EDISON one [23] and it has demonstrated its good performance [24]. Additionally, Mean Shift is a feature space analysis technique, as well as RAD, and yields a segmentation in a rather reasonable time, in opposition to other set of methods such as the Graph-Based approaches [25] , (with the exception of the efficient graph-based segmentation method introduced in [26]).…”
Section: Results and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…shows an example of mean shift initial segmentation. For detailed information about mean shift and EDISON system, please refer to [18,19,25,26]. In this paper we only focus on the region merging.…”
Section: Similarity Region Mergingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third segmentation was obtained using the synergistic segmentation of Christoudias et al [7] (figure 3(c)). The algorithm is an improvement of the mean-shift color segmentation [8] with the addition of an edge confidence parameter [19] in the feature space.…”
Section: Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%