ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Art Gallery 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1667265.1667306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous Objects for One Flat Thing, reproduced

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include methods based on video analysis (Camurri, Mazzarino, Ricchetti, Timmers, & Volpe, 2004;Guedes, 2006;Jensenius, 2006), motion capture data (Dahl, 2000;Palazzi et al, 2009;Shiratori, Nakazawa, & Ikeuchi, 2003;Wanderley, Vines, Middleton, McKay, & Hatch, 2005) and sensing devices (e.g., Clynes, 1995;Enke & Borchers, 2006;Yamamoto & Fujinami, 2008). However, the recording techniques impose several constraints.…”
Section: T He Idea T H At Dance and Music Are Closelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include methods based on video analysis (Camurri, Mazzarino, Ricchetti, Timmers, & Volpe, 2004;Guedes, 2006;Jensenius, 2006), motion capture data (Dahl, 2000;Palazzi et al, 2009;Shiratori, Nakazawa, & Ikeuchi, 2003;Wanderley, Vines, Middleton, McKay, & Hatch, 2005) and sensing devices (e.g., Clynes, 1995;Enke & Borchers, 2006;Yamamoto & Fujinami, 2008). However, the recording techniques impose several constraints.…”
Section: T He Idea T H At Dance and Music Are Closelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean results across the ten dance sequences synthesized from each differently parameterized representation are presented in Table 2. Figure 10 exemplifies the comparison between an excerpt of the captured sequence of Charleston (straight line), and synthesized sequences of Charleston with (dashed line) or without (dotted line) variability, extracted from the trajectories of the right hand joint (joint 19), for all considered metric resolutions (see Table 1). The "original" sequence is unique per dance style and thus only evaluated once for each style.…”
Section: Numeric Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the lack of systematic representation of all body articulations in time (e.g., the first and third graphs [16,17] in Figure 2), the lack of representation of cross modal interactions with music and other modalities (e.g., fourth and fifth graphs [18,19] in Figure 2), the absence of representations of the variability of the dance gesture (e.g., the first, second and third graphs [16,17,20] in Figure 2) and the lack of structural models, at some of the representations in Figure 2, indicate how the representation of dance is often complex. Thus, in order to render expressive beat-synchronous dance movements we needed to extend the existing representations into a novel spatiotemporal model (see Section 2.2) that would consider all of the following: (i) the possibility of resynthesis of original motions; (ii) encoding motion trajectories and musical time (meter) in the same representation; (iii) accounting for the variability of dance sequences; (iv) support of multi-modal parameterizations for assessing different hypotheses.…”
Section: Representation Of Metric Levels In Musical Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary technologies are those that can be found in the informational era, with the advent of advanced tools. Although the use of technology for dance has been explored since the 1980s, the main focus has been on how to support dance notation (e.g., Labanotation [8] to improve the choreography of dance performances [23], or to provide aesthetic visualizations for performances (e.g., Palazzi & Shaw [52]).…”
Section: Dance Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%