2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10192375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous Control Strategy with Input Voltage Feedforward for a Four-Switch Buck-Boost Converter Used in a Variable-Speed PMSG Energy Storage System

Abstract: The four-switch Buck-Boost (FSBB) converter can produce voltage conversion within a wide input voltage range, which is suitable for variable-speed permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) energy storage systems with AC inputs and DC outputs. To reduce the interference of input voltage fluctuation on the performance of the FSBB converter, an input voltage feedforward (IVFF) compensation method is proposed in this paper. The switching synchronization strategy is simple. Using the switching average model, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WTG with variable speed and constant frequency is the mainstream type of WTG technology application at present, an example of which is a directly driven WTG with permanent magnet synchronous generators (D-PMSGs). This model is considered the WTG technology with the most potential for development in the future due to its long service life, convenient maintenance, and high efficiency [19,20]. Therefore, a D-PMSG was selected as the WTG model in the sending-end AC system with high-proportion wind power in this study.…”
Section: Model and Characteristics Of D-pmsgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WTG with variable speed and constant frequency is the mainstream type of WTG technology application at present, an example of which is a directly driven WTG with permanent magnet synchronous generators (D-PMSGs). This model is considered the WTG technology with the most potential for development in the future due to its long service life, convenient maintenance, and high efficiency [19,20]. Therefore, a D-PMSG was selected as the WTG model in the sending-end AC system with high-proportion wind power in this study.…”
Section: Model and Characteristics Of D-pmsgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control scheme 3 could be adopted considering the need to reduce the overload risk of the HVAC system while mitigating HVDC's subsequent CFs. Briefly, 20 ms after the first CF was detected, the active acceleration control of WTG and the pitch angle control of WTG were carried out according to Equations ( 18) and (19). WTGs are no longer in the MPPT output mode, and the active power output of wind farms is significantly reduced; the specific changes of electrical quantities in the system are shown in the red curve in Figure 7 after this control scheme was adopted.…”
Section: Simulation Verification 61 Electromagnetic Transient Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G id derived using SSA was verified using standard switch models provided in the LTspice software tool. Figure 14 shows the average model of the non-ideal buck converter; the CCM2 library model was used for validation [16]. Figure 15 shows the frequency response of the G id of the practical buck converter.…”
Section: Validation Using Ltspicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], the authors proposed a wide input voltage range DC-DC converter for auxiliary power supplies on solar power conversion circuits or railway vehicles, making use of the buck/boost and resonant circuits to realize this wide range. The authors in [16] designed a four-switch buck-boost (FSBB) converter with a wide input voltage range voltage conversion, catering to variable-speed energy storage systems with AC inputs and DC outputs. The switching average model is used to establish the small signal model of a non-ideal FSBB converter in all working conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques to reduce overshoot and improve efficiency are discussed in [5,6]. Undershoot reduction in buck mode was discussed in [7,8].The authors in [9], [10] claimed to achieve better stability and efficiency with lower overshoot and better stability [11]- [13]. Other techniques to reduce overshoot and improve efficiency are discussed in [14]- [16].Undershoot reduction is summarised in [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%