T he projections of neocortical neurons to the thalamus are much denser than those from ascending pathways arising in the spinal cord and brainstem. Corticothalamic projections are estimated to outnumber thalamocortical ones by an order of magnitude. Thus, although the thalamus is the gateway of most sensory signals in their route to the cerebral cortex, the feedback corticothalamic projections are by far more massive. Until recently, however, the functional role of corticothalamic pathways remained unknown. The main reason was that, in the past, a series of studies using reversible cooling and ablation of cortical areas or, conversely, stimulation of those areas reported a variety of effects exerted by cortex on the thalamus, from depressed to enhanced activity, or simply lack of any definite result. The first advances in this domain stemmed from the recognition of three major neuronal types in the thalamus, with the consequence that the excitatory or inhibitory sign of cortical actions actually depends on a delicate balance between a prevalent effect exerted on one or the other of these thalamic neuronal classes. Two of these three neuronal types in the thalamus are cortically projecting [relay or thalamocortical (TC)] neurons that are glutamatergic (thus excitatory), and reticular (RE) neurons that are GABAergic (inhibitory) and do not project to cortex but back to TC neurons, closing a recurrent inhibitory loop. The most important input sources of RE neurons are neocortical and TC neurons (Fig. 1A). The third cellular type, local-circuit GABAergic neurons, is found in all dorsal thalamic nuclei of felines and primates (as well as in the visual thalamus of rodents) in sizeable (Ϸ25%) proportions (1). Although local inhibitory interneurons play important roles in thalamic function, they are not usually incorporated in conventional diagrams because, for practical factors, most in vitro studies are conducted in other dorsal thalamic nuclei of rodents.The issue addressed by Golshani et al. (2) in this issue of PNAS is that, although all corticothalamic axons are glutamatergic (thus exerting excitatory actions on both RE and TC neurons), the effect of a natural or artificial corticofugal volley is opposite on each of these two neuronal types. Synchronous cortical volleys (which occur naturally during slow-wave sleep when neurons exhibit highly coherent activity) or electrical stimuli produce excitation and rhythmic spike-bursts over a depolarizing envelope in RE neurons, whereas TC neurons simultaneously display rhythmic and prolonged inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs), occasionally followed by rebound excitations (Fig. 1 A). After excitotoxic lesions of RE neurons or transections separating them from the remaining thalamus, the prolonged IPSP-rebound sequences, which underlie sleep spindle oscillations in TC neurons, disappear; instead, TC neurons receive numerous, short-lasting IPSPs from local interneurons (3). This result and others qualify the RE nucleus as the pacemaker of spindles. Pure signs of ...