2004
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.5372-03.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synaptic Vesicles: Test for a Role in Presynaptic Calcium Regulation

Abstract: Membrane-bound organelles such as mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum play an important role in neuronal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). The missing steady state is in contrast to the reported time course of presynaptic calcium in this preparation measured with synthetic dyes (Macleod et al, 2002(Macleod et al, , 2004 during prolonged stimulation periods. At 40 Hz stimulation, no such transient peak is visible.…”
Section: In Vivo Comparison Of 10 Gecis and Sph In Presynaptic Boutonscontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). The missing steady state is in contrast to the reported time course of presynaptic calcium in this preparation measured with synthetic dyes (Macleod et al, 2002(Macleod et al, , 2004 during prolonged stimulation periods. At 40 Hz stimulation, no such transient peak is visible.…”
Section: In Vivo Comparison Of 10 Gecis and Sph In Presynaptic Boutonscontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…A narrow dynamic range would be expected for both indicators from their large Hill coefficient of n ϭ 3.3 [GCaMP1.3 (Nakai et al, 2001)] and n ϭ 3.8 [GCaMP1.6 (Nakai, personal communication)]. Moreover, we expected saturation of the GCaMPs in the experiments in Figure 3 because calcium changes of many hundred nanomoles up to the micromolar range can be expected in the Drosophila boutons under these conditions (Macleod at al., 2004), and K d values of 235 and 146 nM have been reported for GCaMP1.3 (Nakai et al, 2001) and GCaMP1.6, respectively, when measured in vitro (Nakai, personal communication). This discrepancy cannot be explained by the interplay of several compensating factors (such as cooperative calcium binding, saturation of the probe, missing background subtraction, and bleaching) because a linear relationship of the GCaMP1.3 fluorescence to neural activity was observed (Fig.…”
Section: In Vivo Comparison Of 10 Gecis and Sph In Presynaptic Boutonsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations