2018
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0566-18.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synaptic Release of Acetylcholine Rapidly Suppresses Cortical Activity by Recruiting Muscarinic Receptors in Layer 4

Abstract: Cholinergic afferents from the basal forebrain (BF) can influence cortical activity on rapid time scales, enabling sensory information processing and exploratory behavior. However, our understanding of how synaptically released acetylcholine (ACh) influences cellular targets in distinct cortical layers remains incomplete. Previous studies have shown that rapid changes in cortical dynamics induced by phasic BF activity can be mediated by the activation of nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) expressed in distinct t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of cortical ChAT + neurons requires a reevaluation of studies that globally manipulate cholinergic signaling in cortex. While many studies specifically targeted cortically-projecting basal forebrain neurons, several have used genetic crosses that affect all cholinergic neurons in the brain ( Chen et al, 2015 ; Sparks et al, 2017 ; Kuchibhotla et al, 2017 ; Dasgupta et al, 2018 ), and therefore include confounding effects from local VIP + /ChAT + interneurons. Studies that use ChAT-BAC-ChR2 mice to activate cholinergic neurons not only run the risk of confounding gain-of-function effects due to overexpressed VAChT ( Kolisnyk et al, 2013 ), but also from incidental manipulation of cortical VIP + interneurons, which are known to have profound effects on cortical function even purely through GABA release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of cortical ChAT + neurons requires a reevaluation of studies that globally manipulate cholinergic signaling in cortex. While many studies specifically targeted cortically-projecting basal forebrain neurons, several have used genetic crosses that affect all cholinergic neurons in the brain ( Chen et al, 2015 ; Sparks et al, 2017 ; Kuchibhotla et al, 2017 ; Dasgupta et al, 2018 ), and therefore include confounding effects from local VIP + /ChAT + interneurons. Studies that use ChAT-BAC-ChR2 mice to activate cholinergic neurons not only run the risk of confounding gain-of-function effects due to overexpressed VAChT ( Kolisnyk et al, 2013 ), but also from incidental manipulation of cortical VIP + interneurons, which are known to have profound effects on cortical function even purely through GABA release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of cortical ChAT + neurons requires a reevaluation of studies that globally manipulate cholinergic signaling in cortex. While many studies specifically targeted cortically-projecting basal forebrain neurons, several have used genetic crosses that affect all cholinergic neurons in the brain 6265 , and therefore include confounding effects from local VIP + /ChAT + interneurons. Studies that use ChAT-BAC-ChR2 mice to activate cholinergic neurons not only run the risk of confounding gain-of-function effects due to overexpressed VAChT 66 , but also from incidental manipulation of cortical VIP interneurons, which are known to have profound effects on cortical function even purely through GABA release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waking is characterized by high monoaminergic and cholinergic tone, SWS by low monoaminergic and cholinergic tone, and REM sleep by high cholinergic, but low monoaminergic tone 33 . Acetylcholine (ACh) inhibits principal neurons in layers II to V in the cortex 34 particularly in spiny stellate neurons and their recurrent network 35,36 . This might be a major contributor to the increased responses in SWS compared with waking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%