2006
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1175266207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symplectic 4-manifolds with Kodaira dimension zero

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
136
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cases where (t, u, v) = (10, 2, 4) or (16,1,8) can be ruled out as follows. The maximal subgroup D induces a Z 3 -action on the set of isolated fixed points of g, which must be free because D can not act freely and linearly on S 3 .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases where (t, u, v) = (10, 2, 4) or (16,1,8) can be ruled out as follows. The maximal subgroup D induces a Z 3 -action on the set of isolated fixed points of g, which must be free because D can not act freely and linearly on S 3 .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When κ s = 0, all known examples are K3 surface, Enrique surface and T 2 bundles over T 2 . Moreover, it is shown in [31] that a symplectic manifold with κ s = 0 has the same homological invariants as one of the manifolds listed above. When κ s = 1 or 2, no classification is possible since symplectic manifolds in both categories could admit arbitrary finitely presented group as their fundamental group [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such manifolds are either CP 2 or an S 2 -bundle over a surface. Minimal symplectic manifolds of Kodaira dimension zero were studied in [8]: it was speculated that they are either K3, Enriques surface or a T 2 -bundle over T 2 ; and it was shown that the χ and σ are bounded if b 1 is bounded by 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%