1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry Versus Sequentiality Related to Prior Training, Sequential Dependency of Stimuli, and Verbal Labeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study has replicated earlier findings in which an increase in reaction time from training to test, and a decrease during the test has been shown (Arntzen & Holth, 1997;Holth & Arntzen, 1998a, 1998b. Fields and Verhave (1987) have postulated that as nodal distance increases, accuracy of responding decreases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current study has replicated earlier findings in which an increase in reaction time from training to test, and a decrease during the test has been shown (Arntzen & Holth, 1997;Holth & Arntzen, 1998a, 1998b. Fields and Verhave (1987) have postulated that as nodal distance increases, accuracy of responding decreases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, stimulus equivalence has been shown after simultaneous matching and delayed matching to sample with different retention intervals (Arntzen, 2006;Arntzen, Galaen, & Halvorsen, 2007). Furthermore, some studies have shown that certain stimuli with which the participants have a learning history could have an inhibitory effect on equivalence class formation (Holth & Arntzen, 1998b;Leslie, Tierney, Robinson, Keenan, & Watt, 1993;Plaud, 1995). Hence, as pointed out by Sidman (1992), in conditional discrimination experiments derived stimulus relations may arise of reasons other than the experimental conditions explicitly arranged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verbal mediation could be inferred from an interview at the end of the experiment or assessed during the experiment by using a procedure similar to the one proposed in the current study. The explanatory status of such verbal reports is discussed elsewhere (e.g., Holth & Arntzen, 1998;Shimoff, 1984Shimoff, , 1986. However, rules need not be provided by others to control behavior; they can be self-generated (Rosenfarb, Newland, Brannon, & Howey, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%