2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03393069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Silent Dog” Method: Analyzing the Impact of Self-Generated Rules When Teaching Different Computer Chains to Boys with Autism

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to extend the literature on verbal self-regulation by using the "silent dog" method to evaluate the role of verbal regulation over nonverbal behavior in 2 individuals with autism. Participants were required to talk-aloud while performing functional computer tasks.Then the effects of distracters with increasing demands on target behavior were evaluated as well as whether self-talk emitted by Participant 1 could be used to alter Participant 2's performance. Results suggest that parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no previous studies have been published which have attempted to establish RGB in individuals in these populations. One study on RGB in individuals with developmental disabilities evaluated the effects of self-generated rules on computer tasks (Arntzen, Halstradtro, & Halstradtro, 2009). Using the "silent dog" strategy, they assessed the control of self-instructions on the behavior of a boy with autism.…”
Section: Rule-governed Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no previous studies have been published which have attempted to establish RGB in individuals in these populations. One study on RGB in individuals with developmental disabilities evaluated the effects of self-generated rules on computer tasks (Arntzen, Halstradtro, & Halstradtro, 2009). Using the "silent dog" strategy, they assessed the control of self-instructions on the behavior of a boy with autism.…”
Section: Rule-governed Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative indirect behavioral methods come from the cognitive literature and include protocol analysis and the "silent dog" paradigm (Hayes et al, 1998;Alvero and Austin, 2006;Arntzen et al, 2009). Both methods involve training the participants to verbalize their thoughts when performing a nonverbal task and explore whether the resulting self-talk helps in controlling their behavior.…”
Section: Direct and Indirect Measurements Of Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second control is to test if disrupting ongoing talking alters on-task performance. And the third, control is to test if verbal reports from the first control alter other participants' performance) have shown that there is a functional relation between the verbalization of participants and their nonverbal behavior (e.g., Alvero & Austin, 2006;Arntzen, Halstadtro, & Halstadtro, 2009;Cabello, Luciano, Gomez, & Barnes-Holmes, 2004).…”
Section: Correspondence Between Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%