“…In addition to the crowbar and the DC‐link chopper techniques, dynamic voltage restorer (DVR; Alaraifi, Moawwad, El Moursi, & Khadkikar, ; Wessels, Gebhardt, & Fuchs, ), resistive fault current limiter (FCL; Guo, & , L. Xiao, S. Dai, Y. Li, X. Xu, W. Zhou, L. Li, ; Jalilian, Naderi, Negnevitsky, Hagh, & Muttaqi, ), superconducting fault‐current limiter (SFCL; Elshiekh, Mansour, & Azmy, ; Guo, Xiao, & Dai, ; Ngamroo & Karaipoom, ), superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) system (Guo et al, ; Ngamroo & Karaipoom, ), superconducting coil in DC link (Karaipoom & Ngamroo, ), gate‐controlled series capacitor (Mohammadpour, Zadeh, & Tohidi, ), parallel supercapacitor on DC link (Huchel, El Moursi, & Zeineldin, ), series voltage compensators (Ambati, Kanjiya, & Khadkikar, ), battery ESS (Guo, Xiao, & Dai, ), and dynamic resistor‐based (Yan, Venkataramanan, Wang, Dong, & Zhang, ) techniques are proposed for DFIG LVRT improvement. However, unlike the other passive methods (i.e., crowbar, DC‐link chopper), these methods require substantial hardware circuits, which would increase the overall system cost and complexity of the control scheme.…”