2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-019-02323-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic powers of sums of ideals

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in terms of sets of associated primes and minimal associated primes. By [4,Proposition 3.3], for any filtrations {I i } i≥0 and {J j } j≥0 in A and B, respectively, we have for any integer n ≥ 0 an isomorphism of C-modules deduced at the level of K-vector spaces:…”
Section: Proofs Of the Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…in terms of sets of associated primes and minimal associated primes. By [4,Proposition 3.3], for any filtrations {I i } i≥0 and {J j } j≥0 in A and B, respectively, we have for any integer n ≥ 0 an isomorphism of C-modules deduced at the level of K-vector spaces:…”
Section: Proofs Of the Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus for n ≥ 2 in the intersection of (I + J) n as in Lemma 2.5 we cannot omit any component involving P 2 . We certainly cannot omit the minimal component P 1 + Q 1 , and we cannot omit the component for P 1 + Q 2 because n i=0 p i1 q n−i,1 ∩ n i=0 p i2 q n−i,1 ∩ n i=0 p i2 q n−i,2 = n i=0 (x 1 , x 2 ) 4i q n−i,1 ∩ n i=0 p i2 J n−i = n i=0 (x 1 , x 2 ) 4i q n−i,1 ∩ J n + (x 4 1 , x 3 1 x 2 , x 1 x 3 2 , x 4 2 , x 3 ) contains x 3 q n1 and is thus not a subset of (I + J) n . This proves that for all n ≥ 2, (I + J) n has four associated primes.…”
Section: A Few Concluding Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Random examples show that depth R/I t (respectively, reg R/I t ) tends to be a non-increasing (respectively, non-decreasing) function, though that is not the case in general [1,2,13,14]. Bandari, Herzog and Hibi [1] asked whether depth R/I t is a non-increasing function for squarefree monomial ideals.…”
Section: Depth and Regularity Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%