2020
DOI: 10.14712/23361980.2020.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic and social boundaries of the integration of Russian immigrants in Czechia

Abstract: This article focuses on the integration process of Russian immigrants into Czech society. The integration of immigrants into Czech society is a key topic in the public debate as well as a political issue. Ukrainians, Slovaks, Vietnamese, and Russians are the most numerous groups within the half-million migrant population. Czechia is therefore predominantly attractive to non-EU immigrants. Representing highly educated and financially well-secured migrants who come as entire families, the Russians are distinct f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial pattern of Britons is shown in Figure 8, and the LISA maps for other groups would be very similar. The node for Russians lies between the aforementioned clusters since Russians were partly dispersed across the city and, given their relatively high socio-economic status, in attractive localities (Ignatyeva 2020). Smaller groups that were also only concentrated in these localities—and, thus, had a low spatial relatedness to the majority and CEE groups—are further to the bottom-right of Figure 7 (e.g., Thais, Koreans, and Japanese).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial pattern of Britons is shown in Figure 8, and the LISA maps for other groups would be very similar. The node for Russians lies between the aforementioned clusters since Russians were partly dispersed across the city and, given their relatively high socio-economic status, in attractive localities (Ignatyeva 2020). Smaller groups that were also only concentrated in these localities—and, thus, had a low spatial relatedness to the majority and CEE groups—are further to the bottom-right of Figure 7 (e.g., Thais, Koreans, and Japanese).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%