Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2005.1599787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbol Synchronisation Implementation for Low-Power RF Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manchester coding is an example of this, which is obtained by taking the XOR of the data bit and the clock signal. Synchronization technique based on Manchester coding for wireless sensor network has been proposed in [7]. In [7], an edge detector and a counter have been used to detect the bits.…”
Section: Fig 2 Methods For Synchronization In Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Manchester coding is an example of this, which is obtained by taking the XOR of the data bit and the clock signal. Synchronization technique based on Manchester coding for wireless sensor network has been proposed in [7]. In [7], an edge detector and a counter have been used to detect the bits.…”
Section: Fig 2 Methods For Synchronization In Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronization technique based on Manchester coding for wireless sensor network has been proposed in [7]. In [7], an edge detector and a counter have been used to detect the bits. However, an external clock is needed to run the counter.…”
Section: Fig 2 Methods For Synchronization In Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A local oscillator directly modulates the baseband data and an envelope detector is used to perform non-coherent downconversion at the receive side [11,12]. This system removes the need for any active components such as power-hungry mixers and PLLs in the receiver.…”
Section: B Ook Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the Manchester decoder are described in [7]. In the chosen implementation, a nominal oversampling ratio of 8 is used with respect to the bit period.…”
Section: Manchester Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is more serious as it creates two new transitions and could therefore cause an error in the decoding process. Both of these effects are expected to be more destructive when the sampling clock error is large, as a reduction in mark to space ratio while operating at the limits of the Manchester decoder may cause valid transitions to be missed [7].…”
Section: B System Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%