2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbiotic offshore energy harvesting and storage systems

Abstract: Taken separately various offshore energy harvesting and storage machines can have a difficult time competing with land-based systems with regard to both initial capital cost and variable costs. However, collocating systems in a symbiotic way can lead to competitive advantages for offshore systems. This paper explores such combinations based on using the support structure for an offshore wind turbine as a basis for an energy storage system, a wave energy harvesting system, and a uranium-from-seawater mining sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown for seawater uranium harvesting, the production cost of the extracted metal has the potential to be significantly decreased by combining the system with an offshore wind turbine, while also doubling the resource harvested per square meter of ocean. The symbiotic approach of sharing structure and maintenance equipment/personnel among multiple collocated energy systems to reduce capital and operating costs could also be applied to other current and proposed offshore structures to increase offshore energy profitability [63]. Future work on this project may consider applying unused offshore hydrocarbon production platforms as energy harvesting and mineral production hubs, and even as support for aquaculture efforts [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown for seawater uranium harvesting, the production cost of the extracted metal has the potential to be significantly decreased by combining the system with an offshore wind turbine, while also doubling the resource harvested per square meter of ocean. The symbiotic approach of sharing structure and maintenance equipment/personnel among multiple collocated energy systems to reduce capital and operating costs could also be applied to other current and proposed offshore structures to increase offshore energy profitability [63]. Future work on this project may consider applying unused offshore hydrocarbon production platforms as energy harvesting and mineral production hubs, and even as support for aquaculture efforts [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond just searching for better solutions of a particular type, substantial increases in cost effectiveness may be achieved through symbiotic approaches such as combining harvesting of food and minerals along with energy. 141 For example, solar power systems take up large areas of land and require water for periodic cleaning. Added value can be obtained by growing high value crops that do better in the shade in the solar collection field, such as coffee and many types of vegetables.…”
Section: Vi2 Symbiotic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a 28-day exposure cycle may harvest more uranium in a shorter time, it also requires more re-uses than the 42-day exposure cycle and thus is likely to be more costly in the operation/logistics. However, novel adsorbent deployment/elution processes such as a symbiotic offshore energy harvest system (Slocum, 2015) may significantly reduce the cost of operation/logistics and thus favor the short-term cycle/high frequency re-use approach.…”
Section: Figure 19 Total Harvestable Uranium (G/kg) Vs Cumulative Smentioning
confidence: 99%