2010
DOI: 10.1179/146431510x12626982043561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syllabic Processing in Deaf Readers of French: A Second-Language Question?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The task itself also involves reading the word, segmenting it and extracting the appropriate letters corresponding to the base (also Apel & Thomas-Tate, 2009). The use of morphological tasks that differ in terms of cognitive constraints, where one is more demanding than the other, could lead to different patterns of results, as has been demonstrated in other studies (see, for example, Daigle, Ammar, Bastien, Berthiaume, & Besse, 2010). In our study, the most demanding task, decomposition, was less successful in the three groups, especially for the dyslexic participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The task itself also involves reading the word, segmenting it and extracting the appropriate letters corresponding to the base (also Apel & Thomas-Tate, 2009). The use of morphological tasks that differ in terms of cognitive constraints, where one is more demanding than the other, could lead to different patterns of results, as has been demonstrated in other studies (see, for example, Daigle, Ammar, Bastien, Berthiaume, & Besse, 2010). In our study, the most demanding task, decomposition, was less successful in the three groups, especially for the dyslexic participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Also, it is possible that the low results of the dyslexics on the decomposition task could be explained by incomplete lexical representations of words. The use of morphological tasks that differ in terms of cognitive constraints, where one is more demanding than the other, could lead to different patterns of results, as has been demonstrated in other studies (see, for example, Daigle, Ammar, Bastien, Berthiaume, & Besse, 2010). Plisson, Daigle, and Montésinos-Gelet (2013) conducted a study where the dyslexic participants produced unexpected spelling forms on a writing task, thus revealing the probable instabilities of their spelling representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…L'épreuve GS−, inspirée de Transler et al (1999), est uneépreuve de jugement de ressemblance. Elle aété utilisée auprès d'adultes en difficulté et d'élèves sourds (Daigle, Ammar, Bastien, Berthiaume, & Besse, 2010b;Daigle & Armand, 2008). Les participants devaient déterminer lequel de deux pseudo-mots ( * cabri ou carbi) ressemblait le plusà un pseudomot cible (capli).…”
Section: Matérielunclassified
“…Cette tâche a aussiété utilisée auprès d'adultes en difficulté (Daigle et al, 2010b). Les principes de création des items, de présentation du matériel et de la position de la réponse attendueénoncée pour l'épreuve GP+ s'appliquent aussià l'épreuve GS+.…”
Section: Matérielunclassified
“…Inspired by Transler, Leybaert, and Gombert (1999), the GS− task is a similarity judgment task similar to the task used in other studies (e.g., Daigle &Armand, 2008 andBesse, 2010b). This task requires subjects to select from two comparison pseudo-words the one that most nearly resembles a target pseudoword.…”
Section: Experimental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%