Switzerland's COVID‐19 policy response: Consociational crisis management and neo‐corporatist reopening

Abstract

Switzerland responded to the first COVID‐19 wave fairly successfully by employing both public health and economic measures. During the state of emergency, the federal government made a firm decision to flatten the infection curve and to protect especially at‐risk populations. During the lockdown period, the focus of the political debate shifted from health to the economy as the Federal Council (i.e., the national executive) started to prepare for the country's reopening. While government still had full power due to the emergency situation defined under national epidemic law, the shift in the debate also meant a shift in the way that the government made decisions. Switzerland is a power‐sharing consociational democracy with strong neo‐corporatist features. While the executive untypically relied heavily on health experts within and outside the administration during the lockdown, the reopening strategy shows clear features of Swiss neo‐corporatism, including the resurgence and influence of the traditional big economic vested interests over the government's approach to decision making.

Can Teachers’ Discretion Enhance the Role of Professionalism in Times of Crisis? A Comparative Policy Analysis of Distance Teaching in Italy and Switzerland during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…In the former, the central government provides substantial input, while in the latter, cantons play a major role. In both cases, the original compulsory policy input aimed at health protection during the pandemic came from the central level (Malandrino and Demichelis 2020;Sager and Mavrot 2020). Both central governments' acts implied a prohibition to carry out classroom teaching and an obligation to carry out distance teaching instead, in order to balance that aim with the right to education.…”

The (mis)fit of policy programs to political institutions and its influence on programmatic action – How crisis has differently hit French and German health policy

“…Given that future challenges cannot be anticipated correctly and thus underlie great uncertainty, a policy program's success can also be considered as dependent on its ability to adapt to new situations, and to solve upcoming problems in an at least apparently functional way, even if the proposed policy does not exactly fit the identified challenges (Hannah, 2018). Only recently, the COVID‐19 pandemic has outlined the importance of health policy responses within the established structures of the health care structures and political system (Petridou, 2020; Sager & Mavrot, 2020; Weible et al., 2020). Put in a hypothesis, one would assume that a policy program is more successful if it is able to adapt to new challenges.…”

Herd‐immunity across intangible borders: Public policy responses to COVID‐19 in Ireland and the UK

“…This coincides with a fall in public support for the Conservative party since the December 2019 general election, when Boris Johnson's party achieved a substantial winning margin of 11.5% ahead of Labour, as support for the two main parties has narrowed considerably to single digits (see Figure 8). In any event, while Prime Minister Johnson may initially have been reluctant to introduce an economic lockdown for fear of a backlash from the pro-business wing of his party (reflections on the role of businesses interests in a country under COVID-19 are also included in Sager & Mavrot, 2020), or whether he truly underestimated the risks of the pandemic, arguably, the fall in public support may have precipitated the government's belated move to implement a lockdown.…”