Switching to sanitation: Understanding latrine adoption in a representative panel of rural Indian households

Abstract

Open defecation, which is still practiced by about a billion people worldwide, is one of the most compelling examples of how place influences health in developing countries. Efforts by governments and development organizations to address the world’s remaining open defecation would be greatly supported by a better understanding of why some people adopt latrines and others do not. We analyze the 2005 and 2012 rounds of the India Human Development Survey (IHDS), a nationally representative panel of households in India, the country which is home to 60% of the people worldwide who defecate in the open. Among rural households that defecated in the open in 2005, we investigate what baseline properties and what changes over time are associated with switching to latrine use between 2005 and 2012. We find that households that are richer or better educated, that have certain demographic properties, or that improved their homes over this period were more likely to switch to using a latrine or toilet. However, each of these effect sizes is small; overall switching to latrine use from open defecation is low; and no ready household-level mechanisms are available for sanitation programs to widely influence these factors. Our research adds to a growing consensus in the literature that the social context should not be overlooked when trying to understand and bring about change in sanitation behavior.

Sanitation and Religion in South Asia: What Accounts for Differences across Countries?

“…Although these factors are significantly associated with open defecation in the region, the magnitudes of these associations are small relative to that of religion and open defecation. This finding aligns with recent evidence that economic, education, demographic, and home improvement changes only weakly explain latrine adoption in rural India between 2005 and 2012 (Coffey, Spears, & Vyas, 2017b). …”

Hunter-gatherer health and development policy: How the promotion of sedentism worsens the Agta's health outcomes

“…Given these findings, a solution which brings the supposed benefits of sedentarisation (primarily access to health care) without the negative health outcomes associated with permanent camps is far more preferable. As has been pointed out by Coffey et al (2017) the social and cultural context is crucial when trying to understand and bring about change in sanitation behaviour.…”

Assessing willingness to pay for upgrading toilets in rural areas of Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia, China

“…Jenkins et al suggested that 37% of households were willing to install toilets in Ghana [13]. Coffey et al observed income, education, and improved housing could affect the attitude of rural Indian households to use in toilets [14]. Lamichhane et al suggested that more than 60% of respondents were willing to pay for toilets in Hawaii and observed that gender, age, and income could affect the respondents' attitudes [15].…”