2004
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbh122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swimming in formation in krill (Euphausiacea), a hypothesis: dynamics of the flow field, properties of antennular sensor systems and a sensory-motor link

Abstract: The act of swimming in formation by species such as Euphausia superba, Antarctic krill, is assumed to be regulated by a sensitivity to the characteristic and spatially elaborate flow field produced by this species of shrimp. We used a related species, Meganyctiphanes, North Atlantic krill, to visualize the flow field produced by tethered shrimps in an aquarium. In this situation, the propulsion jet flow some centimeters behind the shrimp is surrounded by a vortex ring of recoiling water motion from which, if t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, studies on tethered specimens do not provide an accurate representation of the induced flow fields. The free-swimming E. pacifica flow field more closely resembled the findings of tethered studies, with a distinct downward-directed jet (Kils, 1982;Yen et al, 2003;Patria and Wiese, 2004), whereas the non-uniformity and K. B. Catton and others variation in direction produced by each stroke of the pleopods was more apparent in the E. superba flow fields. Unlike the study by Patria and Wiese (Patria and Wiese, 2004), the larger species (E. superba) did not produce vortex rings from the side view, which suggests that the observed vortex rings were an artifact of the aquarium or tethering in their study.…”
Section: Flow Fieldssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, studies on tethered specimens do not provide an accurate representation of the induced flow fields. The free-swimming E. pacifica flow field more closely resembled the findings of tethered studies, with a distinct downward-directed jet (Kils, 1982;Yen et al, 2003;Patria and Wiese, 2004), whereas the non-uniformity and K. B. Catton and others variation in direction produced by each stroke of the pleopods was more apparent in the E. superba flow fields. Unlike the study by Patria and Wiese (Patria and Wiese, 2004), the larger species (E. superba) did not produce vortex rings from the side view, which suggests that the observed vortex rings were an artifact of the aquarium or tethering in their study.…”
Section: Flow Fieldssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The free-swimming E. pacifica flow field more closely resembled the findings of tethered studies, with a distinct downward-directed jet (Kils, 1982;Yen et al, 2003;Patria and Wiese, 2004), whereas the non-uniformity and K. B. Catton and others variation in direction produced by each stroke of the pleopods was more apparent in the E. superba flow fields. Unlike the study by Patria and Wiese (Patria and Wiese, 2004), the larger species (E. superba) did not produce vortex rings from the side view, which suggests that the observed vortex rings were an artifact of the aquarium or tethering in their study. Vortex rings were also not produced in the flow field of a model lobster (235mm body length) performing pleopod swimming (Lim and DeMont, 2009), thus suggesting that vortex rings may not form, even at larger Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Flow Fieldssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to the complex social behaviour of krill aggregations recently observed (Price 1989, Greene et al 1992, Heywood 1996, Patria & Wiese 2004, we can also assume that the short-term velocity fluctuations around w z for a krill aggregation do not contribute to dispersal but rather to maintenance of the aggregation against turbulent diffusion. It is therefore difficult to assume that the nonlinearity of individual krill movements could be simulated by an additional diffusion term (Visser & Thygesen 2003), as proposed by Wroblewski (1982) and used by Zakardjian et al (1999) for copepods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of euphausiid sensing distance have been made from a number of sources, including diver observations (1-2 m for E. superba; Ragulin, 1969), net avoidance (1.7-2.3 m for Nematoscelis megalops; Wiebe et al, 1982), and rheotactic sensing abilities (0.16-1 m for E. superba; Wiese 1996, Patria andWiese, 2004). From such measurements of responses mostly to large objects, it is difficult to estimate at what distance a krill might be able to respond to conspecifics.…”
Section: 23a Threshold Volume Backscattering Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%