Swiftness and Intensity of Administrative Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study of TQM in Information Systems

Abstract

Considerable attention has been directed toward developing a more complete understanding of innovation adoption by Information Systems (IS) departments. Much of this research has focused on the adoption of technological innovations, and limited research has focused on the adoption of administrative innovations. This paper focuses on an administrative innovation that is increasingly becoming popular among IS departments, namely Total Quality Management (TQM) in systems development. A synthesis of the IS innovation and TQM literatures was conducted to identify environmental, organizational, and task-related factors that should relate to both the swiftness and the intensity of TQM adoption. The relationships between the identified variables and TQM adoption were examined using data collected from 123 IS departments in Fortune 1000 firms and large government agencies in the U.S. The results indicate that TQM adoption in systems development is influenced by the host organization's quality orientation and factors internal to the IS department including IS management support for quality, the presence of a separate quality assurance function, and the structural complexity of the IS department. Implications of this study for theory, future research, and practice are discussed. Subject Areas: Diffusion of Innovations, Information Systems Management, Systems Quality, and Total Quality Management.

Are Innovations Being Created or Adopted in the Construction Industry? Exploring Innovation in the Construction Industry

“…The findings also show that it has been a strong culture in Malaysian construction firms to adapt to a well-known design, which influences their decision to introduce familiar and well-known designs to clients. This criterion reflects a study by Ravichandran (2000) that proposed innovation adoption demonstrates familiarity and similarity in terms of its justification.…”

Adoption rationales of new management practices

“…Extant studies explore relationships between characteristics of the adoption of management practices. For example, Ravichandran (2000) relates the rate of adoption with the intensity of adoption, or between antecedents and characteristics of adoption. Damampour and Schneider (2006) examine the relationships between environmental, organizational and management factors on the phases of adoption of management practices.…”

“…For example, Bloom and Van Reenen (2007) and Mol and Birkinshaw (2009) find that management practice adoption associates with superior firm performance, and the review of UK competitiveness undertaken by Porter and Ketels (2003) suggests that low levels of adoption of what they term best practice is a contributor to the UK productivity gap. However, business commentators including management academics often criticise managers for adopting new practices, pejoratively 6 addressing product innovations, some authors use the terms administrative (Damanpour and Schneider, 2006;Ravichandran, 2000); process (Damanpour, 2009;Davenport, 1993); organizational (Battisti and Stoneman, 2009); management (Birkinshaw, Hamel, and Mol, 2008;Birkinshaw and Mol, 2006) or managerial (Abrahamson, 1991) innovations. This study adopts the contingent view of management practices that is the appropriate practice and how managers adopt that practice will be dependent on contextual factors.…”

7 Adoption and diffusion of the balanced scorecard innovation among businesses in Møre og Romsdal

“…Watson (1994) asserts that in its extreme form, managers may adopt practices in order to further their position or career even if the idea is unsuitable or flawed. A number of other studies exist which come to similar conclusions (e.g., Battisti and Iona 2009;Damanpour and Schneider 2006;Kraus and Lind 2010;Lapsley and Wright 2004;Madsen and Stenheim 2014;Ravichandran 2000;Sturdy 2004;Wiersma 2009). …”