2014
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweet lies: neural, visual, and behavioral measures reveal a lack of self-control conflict during food choice in weight-concerned women

Abstract: Despite their intentions, weight-concerned individuals generally fail to control their eating behavior. However, it is unknown whether this failure is due to a lack of effortful self-control, or to not experiencing an internal conflict between weight goals and food temptations. The present study used fMRI, eye tracking and reaction times to assess the degree of conflict experienced by weight-concerned women during food choices that posed either a self-control dilemma (i.e., requiring a choice between healthy a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, while our food decision task is-in principle-very sensitive to conflictive decisions (by yielding several process tracing measures), it was not optimized to induce a conflict between calorie density and palatability (i.e., where participants had to overrule their palatability preference for a low caloric option). Other researchers have optimized food decision tasks for the examination of such conflicts in weight-concerned individuals (e.g., van der Laan, de Ridder, Charbonnier, Viergever, & Smeets, 2014). Thus, inhibitory effects and associated tDCS stimulation effects might have been clearer when preselecting individuals on restrained eating and/or individually optimizing choice trials for self-regulation conflicts.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while our food decision task is-in principle-very sensitive to conflictive decisions (by yielding several process tracing measures), it was not optimized to induce a conflict between calorie density and palatability (i.e., where participants had to overrule their palatability preference for a low caloric option). Other researchers have optimized food decision tasks for the examination of such conflicts in weight-concerned individuals (e.g., van der Laan, de Ridder, Charbonnier, Viergever, & Smeets, 2014). Thus, inhibitory effects and associated tDCS stimulation effects might have been clearer when preselecting individuals on restrained eating and/or individually optimizing choice trials for self-regulation conflicts.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, task-based fMRI studies have been the main thrust of RE neuroimaging studies (Burger & Stice, 2011;Coletta et al, 2009;Schur et al, 2012;van der Laan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resting State Connectivity and Bulimic Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from these situational factors, functional MRI food choice tasks are generally highly simplified, showing (cut-out) images on a plain background, and are thus very different from the real-life food choice environment (109)(110)(111)(112)(113). Situational and taskrelated factors combined might result in very different choices in fMRI research than in real life.…”
Section: Technological Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%