2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweeping under controlled electroosmotic flow and micellar electrokinetic chromatography for on-line concentration and determination of trace phlorizin and quercitrin in urine samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results were calculated from the calibration curve. Determination of Phl in urine sample, based on the previously reported literature (Zhang and Zhang 2011), is important due to the possibility of extraction from the body through the urine. Different concentrations of Phl were found in urine and due to that urine samples were considered as suitable for investigation of matrix effect.…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were calculated from the calibration curve. Determination of Phl in urine sample, based on the previously reported literature (Zhang and Zhang 2011), is important due to the possibility of extraction from the body through the urine. Different concentrations of Phl were found in urine and due to that urine samples were considered as suitable for investigation of matrix effect.…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 To reduce sample dispersion, EOF is typically suppressed or reduced with application of coating to the microchannel 14 or additive to the BGE. 15 In contrast, there are methodologies which exploit EOF to achieve the desired ion pre-concentration and transport effect [16][17][18] in a micro/nanofluidic channel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the many types of modes for complicated systems, the largest limitation of CE is that it lacks the ability to discriminate compounds with close charge‐to‐mass ratios. Therefore, to enhance the separation capability of CE, cyclodextrins (CDs) (Yuan et al , ), proteins (Zhang et al , ), surfactants (Zhang and Zhang, ) and organic solvents have been added to the background electrolyte (BGE) as modifiers to separate the complicated samples (Yang et al , ). CDs have hydrophobic inner cavity and hydrophilic outer wall, allowing them to form inclusion complexes with various organic compounds in aqueous solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%