2008
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.53.5.1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SWAT developments and recommendations for modelling agricultural pesticide mitigation measures in river basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, the trap efficiency will be different for storm and normal rainfall events; (b) a similar fraction is retained in the filter strip for each compound. In fact, there is a difference between dissolve and bound fractions, and between coarse and small particles; (c) the model considers a buffer strip for an entire hydrological response unit (HRU) and not only for the areas really situated along the river (Gevaert et al 2008). The above limitations may cause inaccurate results of prediction about the efficiency of the buffer strip.…”
Section: Field Buf Fer Stripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, the trap efficiency will be different for storm and normal rainfall events; (b) a similar fraction is retained in the filter strip for each compound. In fact, there is a difference between dissolve and bound fractions, and between coarse and small particles; (c) the model considers a buffer strip for an entire hydrological response unit (HRU) and not only for the areas really situated along the river (Gevaert et al 2008). The above limitations may cause inaccurate results of prediction about the efficiency of the buffer strip.…”
Section: Field Buf Fer Stripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although its use for nutrient and pesticide modelling is less documented in the literature than that for flow modelling (Tolson & Shoemaker, 2007), more material is becoming available (Santhi et al, 2001;Muleta & Nicklow, 2005;Srinivasan et al, 2005;Tolson & Shoemaker, 2007;Gevaert et al, 2008).…”
Section: Flow and Nutrient Transport In Intermittent Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, SWAT is increasingly being used to assist watershed planning, with model applications becoming increasingly sophisticated in order to target critical pollutant source areas and practices. However, to date, applications in small basins have been limited (Bogena et al 2003; Gevaert et al 2008; Licciardello et al 2011) and a few studies have focused on applications including detailed soil information. According to Mukundan et al (2010), the effect of spatial resolution on soil data may not be relevant in large watersheds; however, it may be determinant/pronounced in small ones and so it may be appropriate to formulate and simulate land-use management strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%