Swallowing disturbance questionnaire for detecting dysphagia

Cohen, Jacob T.; Manor, Yosef

doi:10.1002/lary.21839

Cited by 69 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…By reading and analyzing the articles on screening devices, we observed the procedures used in each of them. Some studies (23)(24)(25)27,31,(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38) used questionnaires that contained items that should be answered by the subjects themselves in affirmative or negative, or marking on intensity scales; others (21,28,29) used instruments with items in which the examiner observed the patient's clinical signs and symptoms and/or asked the patient to perform some movements, and then marked the response on the instrument. Generally, a failure in one of the issues analyzed indicates a risk for swallowing disorders.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Videofluoroscopy Swallow Study was used in five articles (19,25,29,31,35) ; clinical assessment of swallowing was reported in five (21,22,27,30,37) ; fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was reported in three papers (26,32,38) , and clinical evaluation and FEES were reported in one (33) . Another study (28) conducted the follow-up of patients for a specific time-period and included indicators such as consultation with a speech-language pathologist; special type of diet, and clinical symptoms of aspiration pneumonia to verify the presence of dysphagia.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Logemann et al (19) ; Belafsky et al (24) ; Suiter et al (26) ; Boczko (27) ; Sitoh et al (30) ; Suiter and Leder (32) ; Kawashima et al (34) ; Holland et al (36) ; Cohen and Manor (38) Chart 2. Underlying pathologies sensitivity, change of glottal closure, early rear food loss, and nasal regurgitation (12,45) .…”

Section: Underlying Pathologies Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The indicators or sensitivity, which is the proportion of people with the disease who present a positive test, and specificity, which is the proportion of individuals without the disease who have a negative test result (46) , were observed in 10 studies (19,21,22,(26)(27)(28)(29)32,33,38) . Most presented the final value of sensitivity and specificity related to the instrument and showed specific values to each item of the questionnaire.…”

Section: Underlying Pathologies Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An ideal screening tool should have high sensitivity and specificity so that the number of physiological swallowing tests and the costs involved can be reduced (19,21) . For the indicator of sensitivity, the value ranged between 79.70% (38) and 100% (26,28) . Regarding specificity, described minimum value was 51% (26) and the maximum value was 100% (28) .…”

Section: Underlying Pathologies Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Screening tools for dysphagia: a systematic review

Etges

Scheeren

Gomes

et al. 2014

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To perform a systematic review of screening instruments for dysphagia available in the literature. Methods:For the selection of studies, the following descriptors were used: "questionários", "questionnaires", "transtornos de deglutição", "deglutition disorders", "programas de rastreamento", and "mass screening".The online databases used for the research were Virtual Health Library (LILACS, IBECS, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, SciELO) and PubMed. The research was performed from April to June 2013. Selection criteria articles in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, regardless of the year of publication, whose title, abstract, or text had any relation to the purpose of the research. After reading the articles in their entirety, identification data and method of the articles were extracted for later analysis. Results: The research carried out from the proposed descriptors produced 1,012 articles. After reviewing the titles, summaries, and fully reading the articles, 20 studies were chosen. The publications on instruments for the identification of dysphagic patients started in 1999, and 50% of the analyzed studies were carried out in the USA. The methods used on the instruments were questionnaires, observation of patient's clinical signals and symptoms, the request for execution of some orofacial movements, and swallowing test with water or food. Conclusion: Screening instruments in dysphagia are fairly heterogeneous and have been developed for different audiences with the main objective of identifying patients with swallowing disorders. RESUMOObjetivo: Realizar a revisão sistemática dos instrumentos de rastreio em disfagia disponíveis na literatura. Estratégia de pesquisa:Para a seleção dos estudos, foram utilizados os seguintes descritores: "questionários", "questionnaires", "transtornos de deglutição", "deglutition disorders", "programas de rastreamento" e "mass screening" e foram utilizadas as bases de dados: Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (LILACS, IBECS, MEDLINE, Biblioteca Cochrane, SciELO) e PubMed. A busca foi realizada no período entre abril e junho de 2013. Critérios de seleção:Foram selecionados artigos em Inglês, Português e Espanhol, independentemente do ano de publicação, que possuíam no título, resumo ou corpo do artigo relação com o objetivo da pesquisa. Análise dos dados: Após a leitura dos artigos na íntegra, foram extraídos dados de identificação e métodos dos artigos para posterior análise. Resultados: A pesquisa realizada a partir dos descritores propostos, nas bases de dados utilizadas, gerou o total de 1.012 artigos. Após a análise dos títulos, resumos e leitura dos artigos na íntegra, foram selecionados 20 estudos. As publicações sobre instrumentos para identificação de pacientes disfágicos iniciaram em 1999 e 50% dos artigos analisados foram desenvolvidos nos Estados Unidos. Os métodos empregados nos instrumentos foram: questionários, a observação de sinais e sintomas clínicos do paciente, a solicitação da execução de alguns movimentos orofaciais, teste de deglutição com água ou alime...

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Underlying Pathologies Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Underlying Pathologies Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Underlying Pathologies Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Screening tools for dysphagia: a systematic review

Etges

Scheeren

Gomes

et al. 2014

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Bedside diagnosis of dysphagia: A systematic review

O’Horo

Rogus-Pulia

Garcia-Arguello

et al. 2015

Journal of Hospital Medicine

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Dysphagia is associated with aspiration, pneumonia and malnutrition, but remains challenging to identify at the bedside. A variety of exam protocols and maneuvers are commonly used, but the efficacy of these maneuvers is highly variable. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of seven databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus, from each database’s earliest inception through June 5th, 2013. Studies reporting diagnostic performance of a bedside examination maneuver compared to a reference gold standard (videofluoroscopic swallow study [VFSS] or flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing [FEEST]) were included for analysis. From each study, data were abstracted based on the type of diagnostic method and reference standard study population and inclusion/exclusion characteristics, design and prediction of aspiration. Results The search strategy identified 38 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Overall, most bedside examinations lacked sufficient sensitivity to be used for screening purposes across all patient populations examined. Individual studies found dysphonia assessments, abnormal pharyngeal sensation assessments, dual axis accelerometry, and one description of water swallow testing to be sensitive tools, but none were reported as consistently sensitive. A preponderance of identified studies was in post-stroke adults, limiting the generalizability of results. Conclusions No bedside screening protocol has been shown to provide adequate predictive value for presence of aspiration. Several individual exam maneuvers demonstrated reasonable sensitivity, but reproducibility and consistency of these protocols was not established. More research is needed to design an optimal protocol for dysphagia detection.

show abstract

Audiometric asymmetry and tinnitus laterality

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An optimal audiometric asymmetry index to predict tinnitus laterality is one whereby 15 dB is the minimum aITD of two adjoining frequencies, inclusive of the maximal ITD. Tinnitus laterality dependency on magnitude of interaural asymmetry may inform design and interpretation of neuroimaging studies. Monaural acoustic tinnitus therapy may be an initial consideration for asymmetric hearing loss meeting the criterion of aITD ≥ 15 dB.

show abstract

Swallowing disturbance questionnaire for detecting dysphagia

Abstract: The SDQ is a sensitive and accurate tool for identifying patients with true swallowing disturbances arising from different etiologies and for indicating the need for more in-depth instrumental swallowing evaluations.

Cited by 69 publications

References 17 publications

Screening tools for dysphagia: a systematic review

Screening tools for dysphagia: a systematic review

Bedside diagnosis of dysphagia: A systematic review

Audiometric asymmetry and tinnitus laterality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About