2007
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SUSY R-parity violating contributions to the width differences forD−D̄ andBd,s−B̄d,ssystems

Abstract: We study R-parity violating contributions to the mixing parameter y forsystems. We first obtain general expressions for new physics contributions to y from effective four fermion operators. We then use them to study R-parity contributions. We find that R-parity violating contributions to D 0 −D 0 mixing, and B 0 d −B 0 d to be small. There may be sizable contribution to B 0 s −B 0 s mixing. We also obtain some interesting bounds on R-parity violating parameters using known Standard Model predictions and experi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15][16][17]), one neglects the difference between λ ′ andλ ′ , based on the fact that diagonal elements of the CKM matrix dominate over nondiagonal ones.…”
Section: Rp Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17]), one neglects the difference between λ ′ andλ ′ , based on the fact that diagonal elements of the CKM matrix dominate over nondiagonal ones.…”
Section: Rp Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. This term is of the primary importance here: the second term in (1.2) is proven to be < ∼ 10 −4 in the most popular SM extensions [4,10,13] and, hence, negligible in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We revisit the problem of the NP contribution to y D and provide constraints on R-parity-violating supersymmetric (SUSY) models as a primary example. It has been recently argued in [13] that within / R-SUSY models, new physics contribution to y D is rather small, mainly because of stringent constraints on the relevant pair products of RPV coupling constants. However, this result has been derived neglecting the transformation of these couplings from the weak isospin basis to the quark mass basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. TeVatron is continuing to take data and we will get more precise data from the upcomming experiments at LHC 43 or possibly at a SuperB-factory 44 running also at the Υ(5s)-resonance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%