Sustainable stochastic production and procurement problem for resilient supply chain

Kaur, Harpreet; Singh, SP; Garza‐Reyes, Jose Arturo; Mishra, Nishikant

doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.007

Cited by 61 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[50] Flexibility, velocity, market adaptation, redundancy, contingency planning, technology, shared information [119] Flexibility, redundancy [8] Robustness, redundancy [14] Flexibility, redundancy, robustness, contingency planning [140] Flexibility, shared information, visibility [183] Flexibility, shared information, visibility, velocity [23] Flexibility, shared information, visibility, velocity [62] Redundancy [11] Flexibility, redundancy, [16] Robustness, redundancy [92] Robustness [93] Flexibility, redundancy [184] Flexibility, redundancy, shared information, market adaptation [185] Redundancy, contingency planning [186] Flexibility, redundancy, robustness, leadership [187] Flexibility, redundancy, shared information, trust, leadership, innovation E: Economic; S: Social; EN: Environmental; TBL: Triple Bottom Line (economic, social, and environmental).…”

Section: Sustainability Resilience Elements E-s E-en Tblmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From 2016 onwards, the social dimension is also incorporated by considering the TBL. In total, 6 papers [16,50,62,92,119,140] integrate the economic-environmental dimensions, and 10 papers incorporate the TBL dimensions [8,11,14,23,93,[183][184][185][186][187]. No research was found that only analyzes the economic-social relationship.…”

Section: Sustainability Resilience Elements E-s E-en Tblmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To a lesser extent, the financial situation, reputation, and market structure criteria are considered. This last criterion provides an intangible asset for organizations that allows them to analyze the context of the supply chain to manage sustainability more efficiently [185].…”

Section: Sustainability Resilience Elements E-s E-en Tblmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ability of the members of the supply chain to establish and maintain coordinated work teams and defined procedures for action in the face of possible disruptive events caused by the environment and their implementation when the event occurs. 20 8.62% [2,12,19,32,33,37,46,132,134,137,157,[167][168][169][170]185,213,214,222] Table A2. Cont.…”

Section: Robustnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The challenges of global economies foster supply chains to have to increase their processes of collaboration and dependence between their nodes, generating an increase in the level of vulnerability to possible impacts and interruptions in their operations that may affect their sustainability. This has developed an emerging area of interest in supply chain management, considering resilience management as a strategic capability of companies, and causing an increase in this area of research. Additionally, supply chains should deal with the three dimensions of sustainability (economic, environmental, and social dimensions) by incorporating the three types of objectives in their strategy. Thus, there is a need to integrate both resilience and sustainability in supply chain management to increase competitiveness. In this paper, a systematic literature review is undertaken to analyze resilience management and its connection to increase supply chain sustainability. In the review, 232 articles published from 2000 to February 2020 in peer-reviewed journals in the Scopus and ScienceDirect databases are analyzed, classified, and synthesized. With the results, this paper develops a conceptual framework that integrates the fundamental elements for analyzing, measuring, and managing resilience to increase sustainability in the supply chain. Finally, conclusions, limitations, and future research lines are exposed.

show abstract

Section: Sustainability Resilience Elements E-s E-en Tblmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sustainability Resilience Elements E-s E-en Tblmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sustainability Resilience Elements E-s E-en Tblmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Robustnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While the risk factors of production and procurement problems are usually reviewed and managed as separate problems, there are many similarities in the fundamental issues. In addition, the uncertainty of the parameters of production and procurement are not addressed as thoroughly as other aspects of an organization as they tend to be more pragmatic and inconsistent, [19].…”

Section: Multi-criteria Decision Making (Mcdmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Assessment of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Machine Service Quality

Kevin¹

2021

AJMIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The background of this paper stems from the uncertainties related to machine down time can have a very high cost to modern manufacturing organizations in the form of, productivity losses, product lead times, and poor-quality low product yields. The objective of this research is to review applicable risk management systems and identify the most suitable system for CNC maintenance service. Recurrent CNC machine malfunctions can result in major economic losses, poor customer service, and loss of business reputation. Many examples of the occurrences of down time disruption due to machine failure and or maintenance issues are prolific throughout modern organizations. These instances cause process volatility, disruptions to productivity, digital incidents throughout the Industrial Internet of things (known as IIoT) process, which are all contributors to CNC machine down time risk. While "just-in-time" and lean concepts may benefit the organization in general, these concepts may contribute to risk during process stoppages. The identification, assessment and management of risk is the focus of this article. A combination of modern methods and techniques are presented for comparison to identify the most relevant method to use in this research. The method identified in this case is the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) which is then used as the as the method of choice for this research to successfully address and manage the consequences of risks associated with CNC machine down time. The results of this research utilize the selected risk management system of AHP analysis and priority matrix methods. This is then simulated in the model of potential occurrences of variable risks. The estimation of prospective risk factor effects is identified and analyzed for the CNC production process. The outcomes of this research have identified the most appropriate method and tailored it to the CNC maintenance service, therefore enabling the user to execute the quantifiable risk assessment and management techniques.

show abstract

Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability has emerged as an important industrial strategic outlook expanding beyond organizational boundaries to include the supply chain. Simultaneously, the industry has also been faced with supply chain resilience concerns. Research on the intersection of supply chain sustainability and resilience is nascent and is a consequence of their observed mutual influences. However, confusion about concepts, implementation methods, and measurements of sustainable and resilient supply chains remains. This study completes a systematic literature review that critically examines several major observations and directions. We find the concept of sustainable supply chains is more established, and general agreement on its theoretical foundations exists. Supply chain resilience is relatively less mature. The nexus and relationships between the two topics are often incoherent: there is confusion on sustainable and resilient supply chains establishment; there is no clarity on what practices could jointly advance both areas. A major conflict exists since sustainability generally focuses on efficiency, while resilience seeks effectiveness. We recommend studies to analyze implementation relationships and impact. We also observe that performance measurement systems should be developed to assess supply chain sustainability and resilience performance taking with explicit consideration time horizons considered in these measures.

show abstract

Sustainable stochastic production and procurement problem for resilient supply chain

Cited by 61 publications

References 54 publications

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

Risk Assessment of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Machine Service Quality

Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About