2021
DOI: 10.1504/ijstl.2021.112924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable port development: the role of Chinese seaports in the 21st century Maritime Silk Road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of indicators is concentrated in the environmental dimension (40%). Within this dimension, most of the indicators relate to the measurement and assessment of air quality (17), waste management (13), sediments (12), and soil (11) quality in ports. This is a clear indication that measurement of environmental effects is considered as a focus area, outlining ways for ports to address negative environmental externalities and improve their environmental performance.…”
Section: Slr Results-key Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of indicators is concentrated in the environmental dimension (40%). Within this dimension, most of the indicators relate to the measurement and assessment of air quality (17), waste management (13), sediments (12), and soil (11) quality in ports. This is a clear indication that measurement of environmental effects is considered as a focus area, outlining ways for ports to address negative environmental externalities and improve their environmental performance.…”
Section: Slr Results-key Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, within the sustainability framework comprised by the economic, environmental, and social dimensions, often referred to as the triple bottom line of sustainability [11], ports aim to enhance efficiency and performance and, hence, their competitiveness and economic impact to the wider economy. At the same time, ports are adopting a more active social approach to local communities and a more robust environmental management, abiding to regulations [12,13]. Lu et al [14] argued that there is almost no unequivocal measure or criteria for either promoting or assessing sustainable development in ports while considering the triple bottom line dimensions; notwithstanding, a decade later, a novel and growing body of academic literature on the subject has started to emerge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the authors of reference [25] investigated those environmental problems in 18 ports of China. Using a diferent machine learning technique, the authors of reference [26] benchmarked 15 seaports in China in terms of wasted water treatment as well as air quality evaluation and energy-saving expenditures. Moreover, the authors of reference [27] evaluated the environmental effciency of the Kaohsiung container port in Taiwan, considering the same problems.…”
Section: Overall Port Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, for benchmarking ports in terms of environmental sustainability, hierarchical clustering is used to create dendrograms or cluster trees. For instance, the authors of references [26,30] evaluated and benchmarked several ports in Europe and China considering energy consumption, rate of wastewater treatment, standard-reaching rate of nearshore water, the green coverage rate in developed areas, and expenditure on energy-saving investments per capita. Based on the revealed clusters, they both concluded that the ports in the same cluster with the best performance in terms of technical effciency showed a better eco-efciency performance than other clusters.…”
Section: Unsupervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation