2021
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1978616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable mitigation of heavy metals from effluents: Toxicity and fate with recent technological advancements

Abstract: Increase in anthropogenic activities due to rapid industrialization had caused an elevation in heavy metal contamination of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. These pollutants have detrimental effects on human and environmental health. The majority of these pollutants are carcinogenic, neurotoxic, and are very poisonous even at very low concentrations. Contamination caused by heavy metals has become a global concern for which the traditional treatment approaches lack in providing a cost-effective and eco-frie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional analytical techniques for heavy metals detection in water, such as the quantum dot method with fluorescence spectrometry [20], inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [21], hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy (HGAAS) (Arsenic detection in drinking water) [22], graphite furnace AAS [23], X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence [24], have been used for the detection of heavy metals, including arsenic, in drinking water samples and other complex matrices, ICP-MS method is the most common method used. However, despite these techniques being able to detect a low concentration of metals in water samples, low detectable concentration in heavy metals is in a range of 0.3 to 5.81 µg/L [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional analytical techniques for heavy metals detection in water, such as the quantum dot method with fluorescence spectrometry [20], inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [21], hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy (HGAAS) (Arsenic detection in drinking water) [22], graphite furnace AAS [23], X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence [24], have been used for the detection of heavy metals, including arsenic, in drinking water samples and other complex matrices, ICP-MS method is the most common method used. However, despite these techniques being able to detect a low concentration of metals in water samples, low detectable concentration in heavy metals is in a range of 0.3 to 5.81 µg/L [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy metals are one of the most persistent pollutants found on Earth due to their non-biodegradability and tendency to accumulate in the environment, causing harm to our natural ecosystems in the process ( Gaur et al, 2021 ). There are many sources of heavy metals which can take root from natural and anthropogenic origins, with the former including soil run-off, volcanic eruptions, weathering, and erosion ( Soltani-Gerdefaramarzi et al, 2021 ), whereas the latter are anthropogenic sources that stem from several industrial processes such as ore mining, combustion of fossil fuels, and the production of alloys, steel, plastic, dyes, and pigments, respectively ( Selvi et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these may also lead to the excessive generation of organic wastes such as agro-industrial wastes, municipal solid wastes, water wastes, food and animal manures and other wastes etc. (Gaur et al, 2021b;Pandey et al, 2021;Sharma et al, 2021Sharma et al, , 2020Vyas et al, 2022b). Therefore, utilization of organic wastes for biochar production is considered viable for addressing such issues and is being focused around the world for its possible benefits (Table 1) (Gabhane et al, 2020;Ghodake et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%