Sustainable Management Framework for Transportation Assets: Application to Urban Pavement Networks

Torres-Machí, Cristina; Osorio, Aleli; Godoy, Pablo; Chamorro, Alondra; Mourgues, Claudio; Videla, Carlos

doi:10.1007/s12205-018-1314-x

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• Risk assessment: to assess the system vulnerabilities and for disaster prevention, frequency and severity (Nakamura et al, n.d.); • Asset performance monitoring: to support the management of transportation assets (Torres-Machi et al, 2018) and to simulate deterioration, failure, remaining life-cycle, and network robustness of utility assets (Ward et al, 2017); and • Asset cost control: by considering the link between investment cost and asset life, and valuating intervention alternatives (Feliciano et al, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multi-Scale Bim/Gis Framework for Railways Asset Management

Garramone

Tonelli

Scaioni

2022

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Climate change and urban transformations raise new challenges for decision-makers. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and The European Green Deal aim for a sustainable economy by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. An essential task for reaching this result is to minimize transport emissions and their negative impacts on the environment and the human health. Rail is the future of sustainable transport system, and it can be part of the solution in achieving the decarbonisation target. In addition, even more people are using the train and the improvement of the service offered is an essential aspect to fulfil a greater demand for rail transport. More than five million people daily take the train in Italy, and this number is growing over time. It is demonstrated that more investment in rail infrastructure means a greater number of users, and this is even more true when considering the regional rail transport network. This ongoing research aims to test the potential of a Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) integrated system employed to manage this type of existing infrastructure. A methodology was developed and partly tested on a case study. The purpose is the construction of a system that can be used across different phases of the process: linking the data resulting from BIM and GIS makes possible the development of a federated virtual model used as a single source of truth for project development and asset management.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multi-Scale Bim/Gis Framework for Railways Asset Management

Garramone

Tonelli

Scaioni

2022

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Risk Management (Love et al, 2017b) (Nakamura et al, 2019; (Ogie et al, 2018); (Ajmar et al, 2017); (Pfeiffer et al, 2017); (Ward et al, 2017); (Kruel, 2016); (Inanloo et al, 2016); (Bhamidipati et al, 2016); (Goyal et al, 2016); (Fekete et al, 2015); (Sherly et al, 2015); (Espada et al, 2015); (Baah et al, 2015); (Scaini et al, 2014); (Kim et al, 2013) (Edmondson et al, 2018) Sustainability M. (Heaton andParlikad, 2019) (Nakamura et al, 2019); (Kuller et al, 2019);(Christman et al, 2018); (Torres-Machi et al, 2018); (Chatziioannou and Álvarez-Icaza, 2017);…”

Section: Strategic Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bim and Gis Integration for Infrastructure Asset Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

Garramone

Moretti

Scaioni

et al. 2020

ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The integration of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) is gaining momentum in digital built Asset Management (AM), and has the potential to improve information management operations and provide advantages in process control and delivery of quality AM services, along with underlying data management benefits through entire life cycle of an asset. Work has been carried out relating GeoBIM/AM to buildings as well as infrastructure assets, where the potential financial savings are extensive. While information form BIM maybe be sufficient for building-AM; for infrastructure AM a combination of GIS and BIM is required. Scientific literature relating to this topic has been growing in recent years and has now reached a point where a systematic analysis of current and potential uses of GeoBIM in AM for Infrastructure is possible. Three specific areas form part of the analysis – a review of BIM and Infrastructure AM and GIS and Infrastructure AM leads to a better understanding of current practice. Combining the two, a review of GeoBIM and Infrastructure AM allows the benefits of, and issues relating to, GeoBIM to be clearly identified, both at technical and operational levels. A set of 54 journal articles was selected for in-depth contents analysis according to the AM function addressed and the managed asset class. The analysis enabled the identification of three categories of issues and opportunities: data management, interoperability and integration and AM process and service management. The identified knowledge gaps, in turn, underpin problem definition for the next phases of research into GeoBIM for infrastructure AM.

show abstract

“…While recognizing the importance of flexibility at the local scale, resilient planning argues for the need of a regional and national perspective [2,[9][10][11]. In the planning of road networks, this integrated outlook makes it possible to pursue overall objectives such as overall condition improvement [12][13][14][15][16] or safety performance [17], as well to contribute to the mitigation of the system's structural imbalances [18] and vulnerabilities [4,19]. Given the link between road networks and other essential facilities, such as hospital or schools, and their role in induced community vulnerability [20], reducing these networks' vulnerabilities and structural imbalances should be a primary objective for infrastructure planning.…”

Section: Implementation Planning and Decentralizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Building on prior work [4], we linked possible actions with condition improvement, which enabled us to estimate the condition improvement that a given set of actions would produce on the infrastructure inventory at the end of the analyzed period (Table 1). As we were planning for a 10 year period, in the case of actions with a shorter service life increase (Table 1, SLI) we assumed their repetition until the completion of the planning period [15]. For example, in the case of preservation, a treatment with a service life of 2.5 years, this action was considered to be applied four times over the 10 years of the analysis period (Table 1, column "Treatment/Period").…”

Section: Planning Module: Generation Of Planning Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Sustainability and Resilience through Multi-Level Infrastructure Planning

Salas

Piqueras

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resilient planning demands not only resilient actions, but also resilient implementation, which promotes adaptive capacity for the attainment of the planned objectives. This requires, in the case of multi-level infrastructure systems, the simultaneous pursuit of bottom-up infrastructure planning for the promotion of adaptive capacity, and of top-down approaches for the achievement of global objectives and the reduction of structural vulnerabilities and imbalances. Though several authors have pointed out the need to balance bottom-up flexibility with top-down hierarchical control for better plan implementation, very few methods have yet been developed with this aim, least of all with a multi-objective perspective. This work addressed this lack by including, for the first time, the mitigation of urban vulnerability, the improvement of road network condition, and the minimization of the economic cost as objectives in a resilient planning process in which both actions and their implementation are planned for a controlled, sustainable development. Building on Urban planning support system (UPSS), a previously developed planning tool, the improved planning support system affords a planning alternative over the Spanish road network, with the best multi-objective balance between optimization, risk, and opportunity. The planning process then formalizes local adaptive capacity as the capacity to vary the selected planning alternative within certain limits, and global risk control as the duties that should be achieved in exchange. Finally, by means of multi-objective optimization, the method reveals the multi-objective trade-offs between local opportunity, global risk, and rights and duties at local scale, thus providing deeper understanding for better informed decision-making.

show abstract

Sustainable Management Framework for Transportation Assets: Application to Urban Pavement Networks

Cited by 8 publications

References 28 publications

A Multi-Scale Bim/Gis Framework for Railways Asset Management

A Multi-Scale Bim/Gis Framework for Railways Asset Management

Bim and Gis Integration for Infrastructure Asset Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

Enhancing Sustainability and Resilience through Multi-Level Infrastructure Planning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About