Sustainable Development and Social Justice: Expanding the Rawlsian Framework of Global Justice

Abstract

This article makes two arguments. First, that social justice constitutes an inherent part of the conception of sustainable development that the World Commission on Environment and Development outlined in Our Common Future (1987). The primary goal of the Commission was to reconcile physical sustainability, need satisfaction and equal opportunities, within and between generations. Sustainable development is what defines this reconciliation. Second, it is argued that this conception of sustainable development is broadly compatible with liberal theories of justice. Sustainable development, however, goes beyond liberal theories of justice in many respects. It is based on three assumptions, which are for the most part ignored in liberal theories: an accelerating ecological interdependence, historical inequality in past resource use, and the 'growth of limits'. These assumptions create a conflict between intra-and intergenerational justice, which is ignored in liberal theories, but which sustainable development tries to solve. It does so by imposing duties on developed countries that goes beyond liberal demands, and by abandoning the focus 'solely on protection' that dominates non-anthropocentric approaches to environmental sustainability.

Sustainability labelling schemes: the logic of their claims and their functions for stakeholders

“…The World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED, 1987, p. 8) defined sustainable development as 'development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'. This definition links the environment's ability to meet present and future needs with theories of social justice (Langhelle, 2000). It refers to long-term balances between ecological, economic and social processes at the level of society as a whole and that makes it difficult to fully specify what sustainability ideally means at the level of a particular product, production process or producer (Pezzey, 1992).…”

Synthesising Corporate Responsibility on Organisational and Societal Levels of Analysis: An Integrative Perspective

“…In such a political setting, the primary responsibility of the corporation is to act economically (Scherer et al 2006). Thus, the issues of intra-and intergenerational justice (Langhelle 2000) lay beyond the primary scope of the corporation, unless they are to result in increased affluence and competitiveness through the market mechanism. However, as empirical studies by political philosophers (e.g.…”

A reinterpretation of the principles of CSR: a pragmatic approach

“…Some early expressions have been traced to work in the 1970s within the World Council of Churches (Langhelle, 2000;Dresner, 2002). It was the Brundtland Report, however, the report from the World Commission on Environment and Development, that put sustainable development fi rmly on the international political agenda (Elkington, 1997;Lafferty and Langhelle, 1999;Lafferty and Meadowcroft, 2000).…”