Sustainability Failures of Rural Telecenters: Challenges from the Sustainable Access in Rural India (SARI) Project

Abstract

We have examined longitudinally an ICT for a development project in rural India, closely watching activities and surveying users at as many as 100 Internet facilities in more than 50 different villages. The Sustainable Access in Rural India (SARI) project in Tamil Nadu, India, enjoyed many successes, including palpable-albeit localized-social and economic development impacts as well as the incubation of an-albeit inconsistently-celebrated ICT for a development start-up company (n-Logue Communications Pvt. Ltd.). Ultimately, however, the SARI project did not sustain itself. In the particular outcomes reported here, we follow the prospects of 36 private telecenters which were opened at various times between November 2001 and February 2004. By May 2005, 32 of these 36 telecenters had closed. However, in the same time period, most of 42 telecenters in the same area that were opened and run by a local NGO continued to function. We provide a comparative analysis between these two groups of facilities. We find that the best explanation for variation in a kiosk lifespan was their level of satisfaction with n-Logue Communications. Moreover, those sites that did express satisfaction with their institutional and technical support were in service for, on average, an additional year compared with dissatisfied sites. In addition to technical and operational support issues, we find that the lack of long-term financial viability was a major reason for the closure of the private telecenters. Financial sustainability was not realized by many centers; indeed, 85% of the operators interviewed cited finances as a major cause for their closure. Finally, telecenters that were owned by individuals with prior training in computers, or that had a separate trained operator, remained operational for a longer period. (c) 2008 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Improving Financial Inclusion: Towards a Critical Financial Education Framework

“…Despite the fact that social inclusion models based on telecenters have provided mixed results regarding sustainability (Best & Kumar, 2008), initiatives continue to proliferate, incorporating actions that interrelate access to ICTs with microfinance (Hart & Christensen , 2012), supported, in some cases, by literacy…”

Conceptual Model of Technological Change on Telecentre Effectiveness

“…Telecentre later spread to other countries such as Europe, North America and Australia (Proenza, 2001). Telecentre, also known as multi-purpose community telecentres, public Internet access points, or information kiosks, is an avenue for providing ICT services to rural communities (Gomez, 2011;Best & Kumar, 2008). In line with this, this study adopts the definition by Bailey and Ngwenyama (2009) that define a telecentre as a place where public can have access to ICT facilities and services for economic, social and cultural development.…”

The Influence of Higher Education Institutions on the Sustainability of ICT4D Initiatives in Underserved Communities

“…Heeks and Bhatnagar (1999) proposed the Design-Reality Gap model with the following ten Critical Success Factors (CSFs): information, technical, process, people, management, culture, structure, strategy, politics, and environment. The model takes stakeholders and participation into account, and is able to highlight the main causes of success or failure of an ICT4D initiative, but only for a specific point in time (Best & Kumar, 2008). In response to this limitation Kumar and Best (2006) designed a sustainability failure model built on the Design-Reality Gap model to look specifically at the long-term sustainability of an initiative.…”