Sustainability communication: how to communicate an inconvenient truth in the era of scientific mistrust

Abstract

PurposeThis conceptual paper aims to explore the current state of sustainability communication research, focusing on the challenges of communicating inconvenient truths in an era of scientific mistrust. Therefore, this study aims to (1) examine the existing research landscape in sustainability communication, (2) identify unresolved problems and challenges, and (3) propose strategies for counteract misinformation through targeted communication.Design/methodology/approachFor this, the authors conducted a critical literature review and analyzed the resulting sample (n = 473 journal articles) by means of qualitative content analysis to (1) evaluate existing communication approaches dealing with the communication of sustainability's inconvenient truth, (2) identify stakeholder groups involved in sustainability communication, (3) discuss limitations of current communication approaches and (4) present recommendations on (more) effective communication strategies to address the unresolved issues in sustainability communication.FindingsThe analysis reveals that when it comes to sustainability communication and its unresolved problems, literature refers to four key stakeholder groups: (1) science deniers; (2) adaptation skeptics; (3) whitewashers and (4) world saviors. Furthermore, the analysis provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics involved in communicating sustainability, emphasizes the need for tailored approaches to engage and address the concerns of each stakeholder group, and exposes limitations in current communication methods and approaches. Accordingly, the analysis highlights the necessity of developing new theories, models and methods specific to sustainability communication to tackle its unique challenges effectively.Research limitations/implicationsLike our society, communication sciences need a fundamental transformation to meet sustainability communication's new challenges induced by the necessary shift toward sustainable development.Originality/valueThis paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of sustainability communication in research, specifically addressing the challenges of effectively communicating unpleasant news in the context of scientific mistrust. It fills a gap in existing literature by examining the progress made in addressing these issues and identifying the emerging challenges that need to be addressed.

Purpose wins? A study of purpose-profit orientations, stakeholder perceptions and trust in firms

“…A notable contribution is that differences in trust across customers and investors was inconsequential, and this is contrary to research suggesting there are variances across stakeholders (Sichtmann, 2007;Cordano et al, 2004) and recent research suggesting sustainability communication, in particular, needs a more bespoke approach to engage with stakeholders (Voci and Karmasin, 2023). This outcome should be of interest to corporate communications and investor relations professionals and is a positive outcome for firms communicating sustainability to both consumers and investors.…”

The implementation of inclusion services and social interaction for deaf students at Perwira Bogor city elementary public school

“…According to the theory proposed by Voci et al, effective communication necessitates truthfulness to achieve desired objectives efficiently [10]. Social interactions extend beyond public schools catering to students without special needs, as Indonesia also offers special schools and inclusion schools for students with diverse needs.…”