Sustainability Analysis of Electricity Generation Technologies Based on Life‐Cycle Assessment and Life‐Cycle Cost—A Case Study in Liaoning Province

Abstract

Electricity generation in China is currently dominated by thermal power generation (TPG). To achieve sustainable development during electricity generation, this study compares the sustainability of the six main approaches for electricity generation in Liaoning Province: thermal power, nuclear power, wind power, hydropower, photovoltaic power, and biomass power generation. First, the environmental impact and unit electricity generation cost (UEGC) of each electricity generation approach is calculated and analyzed from the perspectives of both life‐cycle assessment (LCA) and life‐cycle cost (LCC). Then, the energy potential of electricity generation approaches in Liaoning Province is calculated. Finally, the entropy‐weighted method is used to combine the environmental impacts, UEGC, and energy potentials of each energy source, producing a mathematical evaluation model for determining the sustainability of electricity generation. As a result, the six approaches are ranked in terms of electricity sustainability in Liaoning Province as follows: wind power, nuclear power, biomass power, hydropower, solar power, and thermal power. In future development of the electricity industry, Liaoning Province should increase the proportion of wind power, nuclear power, and biomass power generation in total installed capacity and reduce the proportion of thermal power in total installed capacity.

The greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy – Life cycle assessment of a European pressurised reactor

“…Interestingly, similar values (5.29 gCO 2 e/kWh e ) are reported in a detailed study by Poinssot et al [25] solely for the fuel life cycle, thus casting doubt on how similar or even smaller numbers can also include materials, construction, and end of life decommissioning and disposal. Another research, again focused on China, [26] ranked wind first and nuclear second but this time focusing on the sustainability of power generation. The sustainability focus of the study seems to be more economic than environmental, with a breakdown of the impacts on Global Warming Potential (GWP) not offered to the reader.…”

Modeling and scheduling of residential electric loads for energy self‐sufficiency

“…The annual life cycle cost analysis (ALCC) has been carried out to compute the economic feasibility of solar PV plant available with the consumer 28 . The value of the ALCC for a solar PV system is given in Equation (23) where P , υ , and τ represent the initial investment, depreciation rate, and lifetime in years, respectively. …”

Energy harvesting technology based on moisture-responsive actuators

“…With the advent of Industry 4.0, [1][2][3] which is dominated by new technologies such as the Internet of Things, 4 big data, 5 robots, 6 and articial intelligence, 7 the demand for electrical energy exceeds the development of traditional coal power, 8,9 hydropower, 10,11 nuclear power, 12,13 wind power 14,15 and other largescale power generation equipment based on Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, and the equipment for harvesting electrical energy is trending into miniaturization, light weight, diversication, and integration. [16][17][18][19][20] Integrating power supply units into electronic devices to maximize operating hours without charging or connecting wires has been a constant pursuit.…”