The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspicion of White people's motives relates to relative accuracy in detecting external motivation to respond without prejudice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores on the SOMI are positively but modestly correlated with expectations of being rejected or stereotyped on the basis of ethnicity and with perceptions of discrimination against ingroup members (Major et al, 2013). Ethnic minorities who score high (vs. low) on SOMI are more accurate at differentiating White people’s real (i.e., Duchenne) vs fake (non-Duchenne) smiles (Kunstman, Tuscherer, & Trawalter, 2015) and more accurate at detecting White’s actual external motivation to respond without prejudice (LaCosse, Tuscherer, Kunstman, Plant, Trawalter, & Major, 2015). In addition, they respond more negatively when minority targets (but not White targets) are the recipients of attributionally ambiguous positive treatment by Whites (Major et al, 2013).…”
Section: Within Group Differences In Suspicionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores on the SOMI are positively but modestly correlated with expectations of being rejected or stereotyped on the basis of ethnicity and with perceptions of discrimination against ingroup members (Major et al, 2013). Ethnic minorities who score high (vs. low) on SOMI are more accurate at differentiating White people’s real (i.e., Duchenne) vs fake (non-Duchenne) smiles (Kunstman, Tuscherer, & Trawalter, 2015) and more accurate at detecting White’s actual external motivation to respond without prejudice (LaCosse, Tuscherer, Kunstman, Plant, Trawalter, & Major, 2015). In addition, they respond more negatively when minority targets (but not White targets) are the recipients of attributionally ambiguous positive treatment by Whites (Major et al, 2013).…”
Section: Within Group Differences In Suspicionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when Whites overcompensate, they are often seen as fake or patronizing by their racial minority interaction partners (Trawalter et al, 2009). Indeed, racial minorities are often suspicious of positive behaviors when they believe Whites are superficially motivated by the fear of appearing racist rather than by genuine egalitarian values (Lacosse et al, 2015; Major et al, 2016).…”
Section: Are Whites’ Performance-oriented Behaviors Seen As Evidence mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this attentional primacy, it is theorized that Whites’ smiles cue vigilance among suspicious individuals that ultimately aids in relative social accuracy for White targets. Indeed, the greater minorities’ suspicion, the better their ability to accurately discriminate between Whites’ real and fake smiles and detect Whites’ self-reported external motives (Kunstman et al, 2016; LaCosse et al, 2015). These results suggest that suspicion leads POC to be vigilant of Whites’ smiles and helps POC accurately read Whites’ smiles and motives.…”
Section: Suspicion Of Whites’ Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…POC are termed “suspicious,” 1 when they believe Whites’ friendliness is more motivated by desires to avoid appearing prejudiced than by true egalitarianism. Although past research finds that both attributionally ambiguous positive feedback and smiling White targets elicit feelings of uncertainty, doubt, and skepticism (LaCosse et al, 2015; Major et al, 2016), it is unclear whether suspicion only shapes responses to Whites’ positivity or whether suspicion has more upstream effects on mental representations of Whites. We theorized that mentally representing Whites as untrustworthy may have functional utility in interracial interactions by cueing vigilance processes that lead to the advantages in social sensitivity previously documented among high-SOMI POC (e.g., Kunstman, Tusherer, Trawalter, & Lloyd, 2016; LaCosse et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation