1994
DOI: 10.1136/vr.134.8.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspected vertical transmission of BSE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to BSE in cattle, previous fieldwork studies suggested that the disease may be passed from cow to calf (29,30). However, there has been controversy and uncertainties regarding whether or not maternal transmission has implications in the prevalence of this disease similar to those that it has for sheep scrapie (9, 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to BSE in cattle, previous fieldwork studies suggested that the disease may be passed from cow to calf (29,30). However, there has been controversy and uncertainties regarding whether or not maternal transmission has implications in the prevalence of this disease similar to those that it has for sheep scrapie (9, 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case control study in BSE-affected cattle has suggested that maternal transmission may occur at low levels. The existence of postnatal transmission was not evaluated (Wilesmith et al, 1994(Wilesmith et al, , 1997 but no infectivity was detected in the placentas of clinically BSE-affected cows (Wrathall, 1997). Concerning human CJD (sporadic and variant), transmission from mother O. Andre!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, BSE surveillance has continuously improved Annex to The EFSA Journal (2004) and rapid testing programs have been introduced, accounting for part of the more recently detected BARB cases and UK's modelling has been revisited. Moreover, it became obvious that the route of infection of the BARB BSE cases has a high probability though not a conclusive evidence to be feed-borne (Wilesmith et al 1994Donnelly et al, 1997a and b;Gore et al, 1997;Curnow et al, 1997;Donnelly 1998). In its opinion of 10-11 April 2003 the SSC considered that the then available data did not change its earlier risk assessment with regard to the UK DBES.…”
Section: Bse Cases Born After the 1996 Feed Banmentioning
confidence: 99%