Susceptibility to positive and negative mood states: test of Eysenck’s, Gray’s and Newman’s theories

Gomez, Rapson; Cooper, Andrew; Gomez, André

doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00198-1

Cited by 79 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consistent with these predictions, SP has been associated with selfreported negative affect (Jorm et al, 1999, Leen-Feldner et al, 2004and Sutton and Davidson, 1997 and negative responses to stressful or punishing situations (e.g., Carver andWhite, 1994 andGomez et al, 2000). Conversely, SR has been associated with self-reported positive affect (Carver and White, 1994, Jorm et al, 1999and Sutton and Davidson, 1997 and positive responses to rewarding situations, including social situations (e.g., Carver and White, 1994, Gomez et al, 2000and Kashdan and Roberts, 2006.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts positive and negative affect in daily life

Hundt

Brown

Kimbrel

et al. 2013

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts positive and negative affect in daily life

Hundt

Brown

Kimbrel

et al. 2013

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It was shown that a high level of neuroticism caused a debilitating effect on performance after receiving immediate negative feedback, whereas after positive feedback no effect was revealed Robinson, Moeller, Fetterman, 2010). Gomez, Cooper, and Gomez (2000) found that emotionally stable individuals were less affected by immediate negative feedback inducing punishment than highly neurotic participants. Therefore, they argued that performances of emotionally stable persons should be less affected by negative feedback.…”

Section: Core Self-evaluations and Their Impact On Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual Differences Concerning the Impact of Feedback Specifying the Role of Core Self-Evaluations

Krenn¹,

Wuerth²,

Hergovich³

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The impact of feedback on performance turned out to be inconsistent with respect to the significance of a wide range of moderating variables. Concerning personality traits, generalized self-efficacy, self-esteem, locus of control, and emotional stability have been shown to affect the processing of feedba ck. So far, feedback research has observed these traits in isolation, neglecting their interrelations. This study was carried out to investigate the impact of an integrative, higher order concept including these traits (termed as core self-evaluations) on the effects of feedback interventions. Participants (N = 471) received manipulated positive, negative or no feedback (control group) in the scope of two test performances conducted on the computer. Confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the concept of core self-evaluations. Repeated measures ANOVA did not reveal an effect of core self-evaluations on the impact of feedback. Considering the single traits, solely self-esteem turned out to affect the power of feedback.

show abstract

“…Indeed, extraversion and the Behavioral Activation System (BAS) were related to positive emotions, while neuroticism and the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) were related to negative affects [6,14,25,28,30]. More particularly, the cognitive aspects of emotion were shown to be involved in this relationship [4,24,42].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Personality modulation of P300 wave recorded within an emotional oddball protocol

Mardaga

Hansenne

2009

Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryObjectives. -Several studies reported that personality modulates responses to emotional stimuli, including cognitive and attentional aspects of the emotional response. The aim of this study was to refine these results while using visual event-related potentials (ERPs) and referring to Cloninger's personality model. Methods. -ERPs were recorded in 46 normal subjects within a visual oddball protocol with checkerboards as the standard stimuli and pictures selected as neutral, pleasant or unpleasant from the International Affective Picture System as the target stimuli. Results. -N200 amplitude was smaller and P300 amplitude was larger following the presentation of pleasant pictures in low-harm avoidance but not high-harm avoidance subjects. Conclusions. -These results support the idea that both automatic and selective cognitive processing of emotional pictures is modulated by personality. © 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. MOTS CLÉSPersonnalité ; Cloninger ; Émotions ; Potentiels évoqués liés à l'événement ; P300 RésuméButs. -De nombreuses études ont rapporté que la personnalité module les réponses émotion-nelles, notamment l'aspect cognitif et attentionnel des réponses émotionnelles. Le but de la présente étude est d'affiner ces résultats en utilisant des potentiels visuels liés à l'événement et en faisant référence au modèle de personnalité décrit par Cloninger. Méthode. -Les potentiels évoqués ont été enregistrés chez 46 sujets sains lors d'un protocole oddball visuel utilisant des damiers comme stimuli standard et des images neutres, plaisantes et déplaisantes tirées de l'International Affective Picture System comme images-cibles. Résultats. -L'amplitude de la N200 était plus faible et l'amplitude de l'onde P300 plus importante après la présentation d'images plaisantes chez les sujets présentant un score bas à l'évitement du danger mais pas chez les sujets caractérisés par un score élevé à cette dimension. * Corresponding author. E-mail address: solange.mardaga@student.ulg.ac.be (S. Mardaga). Conclusions. -Ces résultats supportent l'idée que les traitements automatiques et sélectifs des stimulations émotionnelles sont modulés par la personnalité.

show abstract

Susceptibility to positive and negative mood states: test of Eysenck’s, Gray’s and Newman’s theories

Cited by 79 publications

References 25 publications

Reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts positive and negative affect in daily life

Reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts positive and negative affect in daily life

Individual Differences Concerning the Impact of Feedback Specifying the Role of Core Self-Evaluations

Personality modulation of P300 wave recorded within an emotional oddball protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About