2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3516-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility to oral cancers with CD95 and CD95L promoter SNPs may vary with the site and gender

Abstract: We investigated risk association of oral cancers (tongue and buccal mucosa cancers) with FAS (-1377G > A and FAS -670 A > G) and FASL (-844 T > C) SNPs, in males and females. A case-control study of 535 oral cancer and 525 control subjects was performed. SNPs were detected in the genomic DNA isolated from peripheral blood using PCR-RFLP. We report FASL -844 T > C SNPs increased risk for buccal mucosa cancer in females but not in males. On the other hand, FAS genotypes did not alter the risk of the cancers in b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the eligibility criteria, 78 studies were excluded in the first step of duplicate screening, 164 studies were subsequently removed for title and abstract review, and 10 studies were removed because they were not case–control studies, molecular biology research, or without available data and not focused on specific loci. Eventually, 9 publications (20 independent case–control studies) involving 3179 patients and 4217 controls were selected, [ 24 , 32 39 ] including 7 case–control studies investigating Fas -670A>G, [ 24 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 37 39 ] 7 case–control studies investigating Fas -1377G>A, [ 32 , 33 , 35 39 ] and 6 case–control studies investigating FasL -844C>T, [ 32 , 35 39 ] respectively. Furthermore, 6 publications involved Asian populations, [ 34 39 ] and 3 studies involved Caucasian populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In accordance with the eligibility criteria, 78 studies were excluded in the first step of duplicate screening, 164 studies were subsequently removed for title and abstract review, and 10 studies were removed because they were not case–control studies, molecular biology research, or without available data and not focused on specific loci. Eventually, 9 publications (20 independent case–control studies) involving 3179 patients and 4217 controls were selected, [ 24 , 32 39 ] including 7 case–control studies investigating Fas -670A>G, [ 24 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 37 39 ] 7 case–control studies investigating Fas -1377G>A, [ 32 , 33 , 35 39 ] and 6 case–control studies investigating FasL -844C>T, [ 32 , 35 39 ] respectively. Furthermore, 6 publications involved Asian populations, [ 34 39 ] and 3 studies involved Caucasian populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, 9 publications (20 independent case–control studies) involving 3179 patients and 4217 controls were selected, [ 24 , 32 39 ] including 7 case–control studies investigating Fas -670A>G, [ 24 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 37 39 ] 7 case–control studies investigating Fas -1377G>A, [ 32 , 33 , 35 39 ] and 6 case–control studies investigating FasL -844C>T, [ 32 , 35 39 ] respectively. Furthermore, 6 publications involved Asian populations, [ 34 39 ] and 3 studies involved Caucasian populations. [ 24 , 32 , 33 ] Regarding the HWE in controls, 1 case–control study deviated the HWE for the Fas -670A>G polymorphism [ 35 ] and Fas -1377G>A polymorphism, [ 37 ] and 2 case–control studies for the FasL -844C>T polymorphism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 53 , 54 Genetic polymorphisms in FAS and FASL have been shown to confer variable cancer risks, potentially due to differences in the function of cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells. 25 , 53 A case-control study in India studied the association of polymorphisms in CD95 (FAS/APO-1) and its ligand, CD95L (FASL), with oral cancers among males and females. 25 CD95 − CD95L is part of a receptor and death ligand system that mediates apoptosis which is important in the maintenance of immune cell homeostasis and immune elimination of cancer cells.…”
Section: Molecular Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%