2014
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.585539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility to HLA-DM Protein Is Determined by a Dynamic Conformation of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Molecule Bound with Peptide

Abstract: Background: HLA-DM-mediated peptide exchange is a key factor in epitope selection, but how HLA-DM selects peptides for editing is not known. Results: Peptide complexes sensitive to HLA-DM editing exhibited conformational alterations. Conclusion: HLA-DM efficiently identifies unstable complexes by sensing MHCII-peptide conformations. Significance: These data emphasize HLA-DM as a conformational editor and provide novel mechanistic insight into its function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
67
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
8
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPR and NMR-based experiments are underway to determine the structure of the conformers and mechanisms of DM interaction. Interestingly, our findings are consistent with a recent structural (and kinetic) study showing that DM-susceptibility would be determined by a dynamic MHCII conformation, and indicating the modifications the complex undergoes as it switches from a DM-resistant to a DM-susceptible form (52). We expect to identify similar conformational rearrangements in our system by structural analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…EPR and NMR-based experiments are underway to determine the structure of the conformers and mechanisms of DM interaction. Interestingly, our findings are consistent with a recent structural (and kinetic) study showing that DM-susceptibility would be determined by a dynamic MHCII conformation, and indicating the modifications the complex undergoes as it switches from a DM-resistant to a DM-susceptible form (52). We expect to identify similar conformational rearrangements in our system by structural analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus we did not observe that DM could directly stabilize MHC II against aggregation. To validate this observation, we loaded DR1 with the weakly binding peptide W1A, which we identified recently as extremely susceptible to DM-mediated peptide release (42), and incubated this complex alone or in the presence of DM or peptide (Fig. 3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…MHC II-peptide complexes appear to be highly dynamic and adopt various conformations (40, 41). Recently, we and others proposed a model that DM catalyzes peptide release by sensing the dynamic conformation of MHC II-peptide complex constrained by the interactions throughout peptide binding groove (42), and recognizing a conformation involving the rearrangement of MHC II alpha 3 10 helical and extended region near the N-terminal side of bound peptide in the vicinity of P1 pocket (21). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet peptide binding studies here suggest that cellular c-MYC levels may also alter the conformation or peptide accessibility of class II molecules. Consistent with this, the conformation of class II molecules is known to be flexible, with loss of DM impacting class II structure and peptide loading (86). Inhibition of c-MYC also resulted in improved CD4+ T cell recognition of BL, suggesting that the alterations in peptide binding to class II molecules along with class II components DM/DO may be regulated by elevated c-MYC in tumor cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%