1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00437125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of clinical isolates of yeasts to anti-fungal agents

Abstract: The antimicrobial activity of amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, nystatin, clotrimazole and miconazole were compared in vitro against 244 strains of yeasts that had been isolated from clinical specimens. The yeasts used in this study included 20 species of Candida, Cryptococcus, Saccharomyces Geotrichum, Rhodotorula, Torulopsis and Trichosporon. The majority of the strains (78%) had an MIC of less than or equal to 0.5 microgram/ml for amphotericin B, 81% an MIC of less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml for 5-fluo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When analyzing other studies reporting clotrimazole MIC values for these Candida species, we can observe that they behaved similarly to the results obtained in our study, for example Hussain Qadri et al(1986) reported MIC values to Clotrimazole between 0.1 to 4 ug / ml for both C. krusei and C. parapsilopsis; Richter et al (2005) reported MIC values of 0.03 at 0.5 ug / ml for C. parapsilopsis and 0.12 at 1 ug / ml for C. Krusei. Both values, the cited by these authors and those our study indicate that in the case of Candida krusei there is no cross resistance between fluconazole and clotrimazole because it has the same inhibition pattern as Candida parapsilopsis.When comparing our results with the cited authors we can affirm that the measurement methodology used was correct and a good antifungal sensitivity was obtained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When analyzing other studies reporting clotrimazole MIC values for these Candida species, we can observe that they behaved similarly to the results obtained in our study, for example Hussain Qadri et al(1986) reported MIC values to Clotrimazole between 0.1 to 4 ug / ml for both C. krusei and C. parapsilopsis; Richter et al (2005) reported MIC values of 0.03 at 0.5 ug / ml for C. parapsilopsis and 0.12 at 1 ug / ml for C. Krusei. Both values, the cited by these authors and those our study indicate that in the case of Candida krusei there is no cross resistance between fluconazole and clotrimazole because it has the same inhibition pattern as Candida parapsilopsis.When comparing our results with the cited authors we can affirm that the measurement methodology used was correct and a good antifungal sensitivity was obtained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous testing of the antifungal activity of clotrimazole disclosed several difficulties. As clotrimazole is highly insoluble in water, the drug must first be dissolved with an organic solvent such as dimethylformamide (3), ethanol (4, 6), chloroform, polyethylene glycol (8), or DMSO (10,16,25,26). Further dilution of the drug can be completed by using an aqueous growth medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…administration for the therapy of systemic fungal infections. Miconazole has wellestablished activity against isolates of dermatophytes, pathogenic yeasts, dimorphic fungi, and filamentous fungi, including Aspergillus species and mycetoma-causing fungi, as well as some gram-positive bacteria (55,107,147,202,255,268,323,345). Miconazole's primary utility is in the treatment of dermatophytic infections, tinea versicolor, and cutaneous, vaginal, and systemic candidiasis.…”
Section: Miconazolementioning
confidence: 99%