1992
DOI: 10.1163/22134379-90003167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surya and Nairrta on the Siva temple of Prambanan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more appropriate place for StJrya. in my view, is in the relief located above the lintel of the chamber of Agastya, where SOrya would occupy a position among the higherlevel gods (see Jordaan and Sedyawati 1990). However that may be, the problem of identifying the deities on the intervening panels remains unsolved.…”
Section: H /Conic Reliefsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A more appropriate place for StJrya. in my view, is in the relief located above the lintel of the chamber of Agastya, where SOrya would occupy a position among the higherlevel gods (see Jordaan and Sedyawati 1990). However that may be, the problem of identifying the deities on the intervening panels remains unsolved.…”
Section: H /Conic Reliefsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Noting that in Bali Sūrya is equated with the demonic form of Śiva known as Kāla, she adds that 'as Sūrya as well as Nairr� ta occupy the inauspicious region of the Southwest, they would naturally show a krodha appearance' (Van Lohuizen-de Leeuw 1955:380). Jordaan (1992), however, disagrees with Van Lohuizen-de Leeuw's identification of the South-facing panel as Sūrya. Along with Tonnet, who calls it the most mysterious of all the iconic reliefs, he discerns a number of notable differences between the West-and South-facing reliefs, for example in body shape and posture, crown, ear ornament, direction of glance, and waist band.…”
Section: Series I (Lokapālas) and Ii (śAiva Digbandhas/navasanmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…She noted that her corrections 'improved the group as a whole for we have now a regular system in which each of the eight cardinal [and intermediate] points is represented by two panels depicting the same god ' (1955:80). Even so, the ostensibly minor modification of substituting Sūrya for Nairr� ta was disputed by Jordaan (1992), who argued that the As� t� adikpālas depicted on the temple are likely to comply with the standard list of the Purān� as, in which Nairr� ta (not Sūrya) is the guardian of the Southwest. 2 Be that as it may, provided we accept the identification of the first series of reliefs as representing the As� t� adikpālas (henceforth referred to by the synonym 'Lokapālas'), the problem remaining is the identity of the eight gods on the panels flanking that first series, and the figures on the panels interposed between them.…”
Section: Art-historical Research Thus Farmentioning
confidence: 99%