2019
DOI: 10.9734/air/2019/v20i230155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival Time Analysis of Hypertension Patients Using Parametric Models

Abstract: Background: Hypertension is a worldwide public-health challenge and one of a leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death. Aims: The aim of this study was compare parameter estimations using both Bayesian and classical approaches and to detect out potential factors that affects survival probability of hypertension patient's under follow up. Materials and Methods: A simple random sampling technique was used to select 430 patients among a total of 2126 hypertension patients who had been un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, various priors (both objective and subjective) for the shape parameter have been 15 proposed as options in Bayesian analysis. The improper uniform and gamma priors have been used in various studies for the shape of the Weibull model, see for example Erango et al (2019), also the joint Jeffrey's prior (Guure and Ibrahim, 2012) or other uninformative priors (Sun, 1997). Most works use the shape parameter itself as a departure point, by assigning some known density subjective/objective prior knowledge, and posit that a prior should be formed for a property of the model instead of a parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, various priors (both objective and subjective) for the shape parameter have been 15 proposed as options in Bayesian analysis. The improper uniform and gamma priors have been used in various studies for the shape of the Weibull model, see for example Erango et al (2019), also the joint Jeffrey's prior (Guure and Ibrahim, 2012) or other uninformative priors (Sun, 1997). Most works use the shape parameter itself as a departure point, by assigning some known density subjective/objective prior knowledge, and posit that a prior should be formed for a property of the model instead of a parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as opposed to the constant hazard function from the exponential model. The Weibull model is still popular in many applied sciences, including reliability and survival analysis [5,12,7,10,23], wind speed modeling [28,3,14] and quality engineering [31,11], to mention a few. However, this flexibility should also propel the cautious estimation of the shape parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improper or noninformative priors have been popular for some time, but the need for weakly informative priors has been realised [21]. The improper uniform and the gamma priors have been used in various studies for the shape of the Weibull model, see [2], [12], [5], [23], [9] and [16] amongst others. A joint Jeffrey's prior proposed by [17,16] is also a popular choice amongst practitioners [4,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%