2003
DOI: 10.3201/eid0908.030145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival ofBatrachochytrium dendrobatidisin Water: Quarantine and Disease Control Implications

Abstract: Amphibian chytridiomycosis is an emerging infectious disease of amphibians thought to be moved between countries by trade in infected amphibians. The causative fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, produces aquatic, motile zoospores; infections have been achieved in experiments by exposing amphibians to water containing zoospores. However, the ability of this fungus to survive in the environment in the absence of an amphibian host is unknown. We show that B. dendrobatidis will survive in tap water and in dei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
160
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
160
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this seems unlikely. The effects of rates of physical contact between frogs on rates of transmission of B. dendrobatidis are not known, but frogs can also become infected by contact with water or substrates, both of which can harbour infectious B. dendrobatidis zoospores [48,49]. In addition, zoospores can be carried and released into the environment by non-amphibian hosts, including nematodes and crayfish [50,51], and non-amphibian reservoirs, including reptiles and waterfowl [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this seems unlikely. The effects of rates of physical contact between frogs on rates of transmission of B. dendrobatidis are not known, but frogs can also become infected by contact with water or substrates, both of which can harbour infectious B. dendrobatidis zoospores [48,49]. In addition, zoospores can be carried and released into the environment by non-amphibian hosts, including nematodes and crayfish [50,51], and non-amphibian reservoirs, including reptiles and waterfowl [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first observation of differences between isolates in their biological characteristics were by (Johnson & Speare 2003), who reported differential survival of 2 Australian isolates of Bd, although this study suffered from lack of statistical replication. Subsequently, 2 additional studies tested for differences in virulence between isolates by inoculating frogs with different Bd isolates (Berger et al 2005, using Litoria, andRetallick &Miera 2007, using Pseudacris triseriata).…”
Section: Strain Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this idea appeared to be temporarily abandoned after Rowley et al (17) retracted their initial report of the detection of B. dendrobatidis on nonamphibian hosts (18). Recently, it was reported that B. dendrobatidis can be carried on algae (12), terrestrial reptiles (19), waterfowl (20), and nematodes (21), but there is currently no evidence that these carriers actually supported pathogen growth or transmission, which would be necessary to explain the long-term persistence of B. dendrobatidis in the absence of amphibians. Other studies have grown B. dendrobatidis on boiled snake skin (11,22), sterilized bird feathers (23), and toe scales from waterfowl (20), but none of these studies demonstrated B. dendrobatidis growth on live hosts with functioning immune systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, it has been implicated in the declines of hundreds of amphibian species worldwide (4-10). B. dendrobatidis is able to persist without amphibian hosts (11,12), which could prevent successful amphibian reintroductions (3). One possible mechanism for persistence is the presence of nonamphibian hosts of B. dendrobatidis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%